Junipersetup ControlApplication · Juniper

CVE-2006-2086

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
High EPSS Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in JuniperSetupDLL.dll, loaded from JuniperSetup.ocx by the Juniper SSL-VPN Client when accessing a Juniper NetScreen IVE device running IVE OS before 4.2r8.1, 5.0 before 5.0r6.1, 5.1 before 5.1r8, 5.2 before 5.2r4.1, or 5.3 before 5.3r2.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument in the ProductName parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in JuniperSetupDLL.dll (loaded by JuniperSetup.ocx) within the Juniper SSL-VPN Client. The vulnerability is triggered by supplying an excessively long argument to the ProductName parameter, which allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the client system when connecting to a vulnerable Juniper NetScreen IVE appliance.

MitigationUpgrade Juniper NetScreen IVE OS to version 4.2r8.1, 5.0r6.1, 5.1r8, 5.2r4.1, or 5.3r2.1 or later. Alternatively, ensure only trusted VPN endpoints are accessed and monitor for unusual client behavior.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Junipersetup ControlApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Juniper SSL-VPN client is installed
    Search for JuniperSetup.dll, JuniperSetup.ocx, or JuniperSetupDLL.dll in the Windows system directory (typically C:\Windows\System32\) or check Program Files for Juniper Networks folder
    Affected if Any of these Juniper client DLL/OCX files exist on the system, indicating the vulnerable client software is present
  2. Check JuniperSetup control file version
    Right-click on JuniperSetup.ocx or JuniperSetupDLL.dll, select Properties, and view the Version tab to obtain the file version number
    Affected if The file exists and has any version number (as all versions of the control are affected)
  3. Locate registered Juniper Junipersetup Control in registry
    Open Windows Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\JuniperSetup.JuniperSetupCtrl or search for 'JuniperSetup' under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT
    Affected if The JuniperSetup ActiveX control is registered in the Windows registry, indicating the vulnerable component is installed
  4. Identify running Juniper client processes
    Open Task Manager, look for processes such as JuniperSetup.exe, ncproct.exe, or other Juniper Network Connect related processes, or run 'tasklist /FI "IMAGENAME eq juniper*"' in command prompt
    Affected if Any Juniper VPN client processes are running, confirming the client software is active and could be exploited when connecting to a vulnerable appliance

If the Juniper Junipersetup Control (JuniperSetup.dll, JuniperSetup.ocx, or JuniperSetupDLL.dll) is present on the system, the client is vulnerable since all versions of this control are affected by the buffer overflow flaw when connecting to a vulnerable Juniper NetScreen IVE appliance.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Juniper NetScreen IVE OS to version 4.2r8.1, 5.0r6.1, 5.1r8, 5.2r4.1, or 5.3r2.1 or later. Alternatively, ensure only trusted VPN endpoints are accessed and monitor for unusual client behavior.

Fix this in Junipersetup Control Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-2086 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-2086 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data