CVE-2006-2481
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVMware ESX Server 2.0.x before 2.0.2 and 2.x before 2.5.2 patch 4 stores authentication credentials in base 64 encoded format in the vmware.mui.kid and vmware.mui.sid cookies, which allows attackers to gain privileges by obtaining the cookies using attacks such as cross-site scripting (CVE-2005-3619).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVMware ESX Server 2.0.x and 2.x stores authentication credentials in base64 encoded format in the vmware.mui.kid and vmware.mui.sid cookies. Since base64 is encoding (easily reversible) rather than encryption, attackers who obtain these cookies through cross-site scripting (XSS) or similar cookie theft attacks can decode the credentials and gain unauthorized privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0= 2.0.1= 2.1= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.5= 2.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify VMware ESX Server versionRun 'vmware -v' or check the ESX server console for the version banner at boot, or check /etc/vmware/ directory for version filesAffected if The installed version matches 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.5, or 2.5.2 exactly
-
Verify MUI web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the VMware Management User Interface via browser at the ESX host's IP address on typical MUI ports (443, 8333) or check if the MUI service is running using 'service mgmt-vmware status' or similar service commandsAffected if The MUI web interface responds and accepts authentication
-
Inspect cookie storage for base64-encoded credentialsAfter authenticating to the MUI interface, examine browser cookies or intercept HTTP responses to locate cookies named 'vmware.mui.kid' and 'vmware.mui.sid'. If present, decode them using any base64 decoder to verify they contain readable credential dataAffected if Cookies named vmware.mui.kid or vmware.mui.sid exist and decode to readable username/password pairs instead of encrypted tokens
-
Check for credential handling in MUI configurationExamine MUI configuration files in /etc/vmware/mui/ or the VMware ESX service configuration for how session credentials are stored and transmittedAffected if Configuration shows credentials are stored in base64 format rather than using encrypted session tokens
You are affected if running any of the listed versions (2.0.x or 2.5.x) AND the MUI web interface is accessible with cookies storing base64-encoded credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade VMware ESX Server to version 2.0.2 or later, or 2.5.2 patch 4 or later. Additionally, address the underlying XSS vulnerability (CVE-2005-3619) to prevent cookie theft, and implement proper secure session management with encrypted credential storage instead of base64 encoding.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-2481 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-2481 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data