CVE-2006-4663
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe source code tar archive of the Linux kernel 2.6.16, 2.6.17.11, and possibly other versions specifies weak permissions (0666 and 0777) for certain files and directories, which might allow local users to insert Trojan horse source code that would be used during the next kernel compilation. NOTE: another researcher disputes the vulnerability, stating that he finds "Not a single world-writable file or directory." CVE analysis as of 20060908 indicates that permissions will only be weak under certain unusual or insecure scenarios
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe source code tar archives for Linux kernel 2.6.16 and 2.6.17.11 contained files with overly permissive modes (0666 and 0777), allowing local users potentially to modify source code that would be compiled into the kernel. However, the vulnerability is disputed and analysis indicates weak permissions only manifest under unusual or insecure scenarios.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.6.16= 2.6.17.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed kernel source versionCheck the Makefile in the kernel source directory for the VERSION, PATCHLEVEL, SUBLEVEL, and EXTRAVERSION values (e.g., 'make kernelversion' or look at include/linux/version.h')Affected if The version is exactly 2.6.16 or 2.6.17.11
-
Inspect source file permissionsRun 'find . -type f -perm -0666' or 'find . -type f -perm -0777' in the kernel source root directory to list files with overly permissive modesAffected if Any source files are found with 0666 or 0777 permissions, particularly in critical directories like kernel/, mm/, or crypto/
-
Check source archive permissionsIf using compressed archives (.tar.gz, .tar.bz2), extract a sample and run 'ls -la' on the extracted files; verify the archive was obtained from an official kernel.org mirror or trusted distributorAffected if Extracted source files show 0666 (rw-rw-rw-) or 0777 (rwxrwxrwx) permissions, or the archive source is unknown/unverified
-
Review file ownership and umask contextExamine the ownership of source files (ls -la) and check if they were extracted by root or with an overly permissive umask settingAffected if Source files are owned by root and have group/other write permissions set, and extraction was performed with umask 0000 or in an insecure environment
You are affected if you have kernel source versions 2.6.16 or 2.6.17.11 present in your environment AND the source files exhibit overly permissive permissions (0666/0777) that could allow modification before compilation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataVerify integrity and permissions of kernel source archives before compilation; obtain sources from official/signed distribution points and compile in an isolated environment as a non-root user.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-4663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-4663 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data