Windows 2000Operating system · Microsoft

CVE-2006-6696

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-12-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Double free vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000, XP, 2003, and Vista allows local users to gain privileges by calling the MessageBox function with a MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION message with crafted data, which sends a HardError message to Client/Server Runtime Server Subsystem (CSRSS) process, which is not properly handled when invoking the UserHardError and GetHardErrorText functions in WINSRV.DLL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A double-free vulnerability in Windows 2000, XP, 2003, and Vista allows local users to escalate privileges by calling the MessageBox function with MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION and crafted data. This sends a specially crafted HardError message to the CSRSS process, which fails to properly handle the data in WINSRV.DLL's UserHardError and GetHardErrorText functions, leading to memory corruption that can be exploited for local privilege escalation.

MitigationApply available Microsoft patches for this vulnerability; for end-of-life Windows versions (2000, XP, 2003), upgrade to supported operating systems or implement compensating controls such as restricting local access and isolating affected systems.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Windows 2000Operating system
Affected:all versions
Windows 2003 ServerOperating system
Affected:= datacenter_edition= enterprise_edition= sp1= standard= web
Windows VistaOperating system
Affected:all versions
Windows XpOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Windows version
    Run 'winver' from command prompt or check System Properties to determine the exact Windows version and build number
    Affected if The version is Windows 2000 (any), Windows XP (any), Windows 2003 Server (datacenter, enterprise, SP1, standard, or web edition), or Windows Vista (any)
  2. Confirm CSRSS process is running
    Open Task Manager, go to Processes tab, enable 'Show processes from all users', and verify that csrss.exe is present
    Affected if csrss.exe is running (this process is always active on affected Windows versions and contains the vulnerable functions)
  3. Check for third-party applications using MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION
    Review any custom or third-party software that may call MessageBox with the MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION flag (0x00000020)
    Affected if Any application or service on the system makes calls to MessageBox with MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION flag

You are affected if your Windows version matches one of the affected editions listed (2000 any, XP any, 2003 specific editions, Vista any) and any code on the system uses the MessageBox API with MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION flag to trigger the HardError handling path in CSRSS.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available Microsoft patches for this vulnerability; for end-of-life Windows versions (2000, XP, 2003), upgrade to supported operating systems or implement compensating controls such as restricting local access and isolating affected systems.

Fix this in Windows 2000 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-6696 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-6696 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data