CVE-2006-6696
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDouble free vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000, XP, 2003, and Vista allows local users to gain privileges by calling the MessageBox function with a MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION message with crafted data, which sends a HardError message to Client/Server Runtime Server Subsystem (CSRSS) process, which is not properly handled when invoking the UserHardError and GetHardErrorText functions in WINSRV.DLL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA double-free vulnerability in Windows 2000, XP, 2003, and Vista allows local users to escalate privileges by calling the MessageBox function with MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION and crafted data. This sends a specially crafted HardError message to the CSRSS process, which fails to properly handle the data in WINSRV.DLL's UserHardError and GetHardErrorText functions, leading to memory corruption that can be exploited for local privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= datacenter_edition= enterprise_edition= sp1= standard= weball versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' from command prompt or check System Properties to determine the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if The version is Windows 2000 (any), Windows XP (any), Windows 2003 Server (datacenter, enterprise, SP1, standard, or web edition), or Windows Vista (any)
-
Confirm CSRSS process is runningOpen Task Manager, go to Processes tab, enable 'Show processes from all users', and verify that csrss.exe is presentAffected if csrss.exe is running (this process is always active on affected Windows versions and contains the vulnerable functions)
-
Check for third-party applications using MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATIONReview any custom or third-party software that may call MessageBox with the MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION flag (0x00000020)Affected if Any application or service on the system makes calls to MessageBox with MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION flag
You are affected if your Windows version matches one of the affected editions listed (2000 any, XP any, 2003 specific editions, Vista any) and any code on the system uses the MessageBox API with MB_SERVICE_NOTIFICATION flag to trigger the HardError handling path in CSRSS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available Microsoft patches for this vulnerability; for end-of-life Windows versions (2000, XP, 2003), upgrade to supported operating systems or implement compensating controls such as restricting local access and isolating affected systems.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-6696 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- blogs.technet.com
- groups.google.ca
- isc.sans.org
- lists.grok.org.uk
- research.eeye.com
- securitytracker.com
- www.determina.com
- www.kuban.ru
- www.security.nnov.ru
- www.security.nnov.ru
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- docs.microsoft.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-6696 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data