CVE-2007-0038
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in the animated cursor code in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4 through Vista allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (persistent reboot) via a large length value in the second (or later) anih block of a RIFF .ANI, cur, or .ico file, which results in memory corruption when processing cursors, animated cursors, and icons, a variant of CVE-2005-0416, as originally demonstrated using Internet Explorer 6 and 7. NOTE: this might be a duplicate of CVE-2007-1765; if so, then CVE-2007-0038 should be preferred.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Windows animated cursor (ANI) file parsing. When processing malformed .ani, .cur, or .ico files containing a large length value in the anih (animated icon header) block, the second or later block triggers a buffer overflow on the stack, leading to memory corruption that can be exploited for arbitrary code execution or cause a persistent denial of service requiring system reboot.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= gold= sp1= sp2all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and Service PackOpen Command Prompt and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify the exact Windows version and service pack levelAffected if The system runs Windows 2000 (any SP), Windows XP (any SP), Windows 2003 Server (gold, SP1, or SP2), or Windows Vista (any version)
-
Verify MS07-017 patch installationOpen Control Panel > Add or Remove Programs, enable 'Show updates', and look for security update KB925902; alternatively, run 'wmic qfe get hotfixid,installedon' and search for KB925902Affected if The MS07-017 security update (KB925902) is NOT installed and the Windows version falls within the affected range
You are affected if your system runs an unpatched Windows 2000, XP, 2003 Server (gold/SP1/SP2), or Vista version where the KB925902 update is missing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patch MS07-017 which addresses this vulnerability in Windows 2000 SP4 through Vista; for systems no longer supported by Microsoft, upgrade to a supported Windows version as these legacy operating systems are inherently at severe risk.
- Open Microsoft Update or Windows Update on the affected system
- Select 'Custom' or 'Check for updates' to scan for available patches
- Look for security update MS07-017 (KB925486) - Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer, or search for the version-specific KB article listed above for your Windows version
- Install the security update and restart the system when prompted
- Alternatively, download the update directly from the Microsoft Download Center using the KB number for your specific Windows version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-0038 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- www.determina.com
- www.vupen.com
- archives.neohapsis.com
- securityreason.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.osvdb.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- www.us-cert.gov
- www.us-cert.gov
- docs.microsoft.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-0038 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data