CVE-2007-0556
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe query planner in PostgreSQL before 8.0.11, 8.1 before 8.1.7, and 8.2 before 8.2.2 does not verify that a table is compatible with a "previously made query plan," which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (server crash) and possibly access database content via an "ALTER COLUMN TYPE" SQL statement, which can be leveraged to read arbitrary memory from the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePostgreSQL versions 8.0.x before 8.0.11, 8.1.x before 8.1.7, and 8.2.x before 8.2.2 contain a query planner vulnerability where the planner fails to verify table compatibility with a previously cached query plan. An authenticated remote attacker can exploit this by executing an ALTER COLUMN TYPE SQL statement, causing server crashes and potentially reading arbitrary server memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 1.01= 1.02= 1.09= 6.0= 6.1= 6.1.1= 6.2= 6.2.1= 6.3= 6.3.1= 6.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PostgreSQL versionRun 'psql --version' or query 'SELECT version();' from a database connectionAffected if The version is 8.0.x before 8.0.11, 8.1.x before 8.1.7, or 8.2.x before 8.2.2
-
Verify database authentication is exposedReview pg_hba.conf for authentication settings and check network exposure via listen_addresses in postgresql.confAffected if The database accepts connections from untrusted networks or users without strong authentication controls
-
Confirm user privilege levelQuery pg_roles system catalog: 'SELECT rolname, rolsuper FROM pg_roles;'Affected if Non-superuser authenticated users exist who could execute the malicious ALTER COLUMN TYPE operation
-
Check for prepared statements or cached plansQuery pg_prepared_statements: 'SELECT * FROM pg_prepared_statements;'Affected if Any prepared statements exist, as the vulnerability exploits mismatched cached plan reuse after schema changes
-
Review recent ALTER COLUMN TYPE operationsCheck database logs for ALTER COLUMN TYPE commands or query pg_stat_activity for current sessionsAffected if ALTER COLUMN TYPE has been executed recently, as this is the trigger condition for the vulnerability
You are affected if your PostgreSQL version is 8.0.x before 8.0.11, 8.1.x before 8.1.7, or 8.2.x before 8.2.2 AND you have authenticated database users who can execute ALTER COLUMN TYPE statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade PostgreSQL to version 8.0.11, 8.1.7, 8.2.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, limit database access to trusted authenticated users only, as the attack requires valid database credentials.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-0556 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- fedoranews.org
- lists.rpath.com
- osvdb.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- securitytracker.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- support.avaya.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.novell.com
- www.postgresql.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.trustix.org
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- issues.rpath.com
- issues.rpath.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- usn.ubuntu.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-0556 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data