CVE-2007-2219
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Win32 API on Microsoft Windows 2000, XP SP2, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain parameters to an unspecified function.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the Win32 API on Windows 2000, XP SP2, and Server 2003 SP1/SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by providing certain parameters to an unspecified function. This is a critical RCE flaw in the core Windows API layer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versions= sp1= sp2all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Windows versionRun 'winver' from the command line or check System Properties to determine if the system is Windows 2000, Windows XP, or Windows Server 2003Affected if The installed version is Windows 2000 (any version), Windows XP (any version), or Windows Server 2003 (any version)
-
Check Windows Server 2003 service pack levelRun 'winmsd' or check the System Information utility for the Service Pack version on Windows Server 2003Affected if The system is Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1 or Service Pack 2 installed
-
Confirm the Win32 API component is presentVerify that core Windows system files exist (such as kernel32.dll in C:\Windows\System32\) - these are required for the affected API layerAffected if The Win32 API system files are present and the version matches an affected Windows release
A system is affected if it is running Windows 2000 (any version), Windows XP (any version), or Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1 or Service Pack 2, as these contain the vulnerable Win32 API code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available Microsoft patches for this CVE; if patches are unavailable due to End-of-Life status, migrate affected systems to supported Windows versions or implement network isolation to reduce exposure.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-2219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-2219 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data