CVE-2007-3855
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to have an unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_DRS in the DataGuard component (DB03), (2) SYS.DBMS_STANDARD in the PL/SQL component (DB10), (3) MDSYS.RTREE_IDX in the Spatial component (DB16), and (4) SQL Compiler (DB17). NOTE: a reliable researcher claims that DB17 is for using Views to perform unauthorized insert, update, or delete actions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9i and 10g allow authenticated remote users to impact data integrity via four vectors: SYS.DBMS_DRS (DataGuard), SYS.DBMS_STANDARD (PL/SQL), MDSYS.RTREE_IDX (Spatial), and SQL Compiler (Views allowing unauthorized INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE). The vulnerabilities require authentication but can be exploited remotely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0.1.5= 9.2.0.8= 9.2.0.8dv= 10.1.0.5= 10.2.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Oracle Database versionRun SELECT version FROM v$instance; or SELECT product, version FROM product_component_version WHERE product LIKE 'Oracle Database%';Affected if The version matches 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8dv, 10.1.0.5, or 10.2.0.3
-
Verify existence of SYS.DBMS_DRS packageQuery SELECT owner, object_name, object_type FROM dba_objects WHERE object_name = 'DBMS_DRS' AND owner = 'SYS';Affected if The package exists and is accessible to the database user connecting remotely
-
Verify existence of SYS.DBMS_STANDARD packageQuery SELECT owner, object_name, object_type FROM dba_objects WHERE object_name = 'DBMS_STANDARD' AND owner = 'SYS';Affected if The package exists and is accessible to the database user connecting remotely
-
Verify existence of MDSYS.RTREE_IDX packageQuery SELECT owner, object_name, object_type FROM dba_objects WHERE object_name = 'RTREE_IDX' AND owner = 'MDSYS';Affected if The package exists and is accessible to the database user connecting remotely
-
Check for overly permissive database user privilegesQuery SELECT grantee, owner, table_name, privilege FROM dba_tab_privs WHERE (table_name IN ('DBMS_DRS','DBMS_STANDARD','RTREE_IDX') OR owner IN ('SYS','MDSYS')) AND grantee NOT IN ('SYS','SYSTEM','MDSYS','ORDSYS');Affected if Non-privileged users have been granted execute or access privileges on the affected packages
The environment is affected if the Oracle Database version matches any of the listed versions AND authenticated remote users can access the vulnerable packages (DBMS_DRS, DBMS_STANDARD, RTREE_IDX) or exploit the SQL compiler view permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for July 2007 or later to address these vulnerabilities. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict database user privileges to minimum required and audit privileged user activities.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,232.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-3855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- www.red-database-security.com
- h20000.www2.hp.com
- rawlab.mindcreations.com
- secunia.com
- securityreason.com
- www.integrigy.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.red-database-security.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-3855 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data