Security GatewayHardware / appliance · Astaro

CVE-2007-4242

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-08-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The pop3 Proxy in Astaro Security Gateway (ASG) 7 does not perform virus scanning of attachments that exceed the maximum attachment size, and passes these attachments, which allows remote attackers to bypass this scanning via a large attachment.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The POP3 proxy in Astaro Security Gateway v7 fails to virus-scan attachments exceeding the configured maximum attachment size limit, allowing malicious files to pass through unmodified. This is a bypass vulnerability where oversized attachments completely circumvent the gateway's anti-virus scanning engine.

MitigationSince ASG v7 is likely end-of-life with no patch available, implement compensating controls such as configuring an upstream/downstream mail server to scan oversized attachments, deploying endpoint anti-virus, or implementing a separate email security gateway with proper large-file handling. Consider upgrading to a supported Astaro/UTM solution if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security GatewayHardware / appliance
Affected:= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Astaro Security Gateway version
    Check the installed product version through the ASG web interface under System > Status or use the command line 'uptime' or 'cat /etc/asg_version' to confirm the exact version number
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.0 (other versions are not affected)
  2. Confirm POP3 proxy is enabled
    Log into the ASG web interface and navigate to Mail > POP3 Proxy. Verify that the POP3 proxy service is turned on and actively processing mail
    Affected if The POP3 proxy is enabled and processing traffic (if disabled, the vulnerability does not apply)
  3. Check maximum attachment size setting
    In the POP3 proxy configuration, locate the setting for 'Maximum attachment size' or similar option that defines the size limit for attachments to be scanned
    Affected if A maximum attachment size limit is configured (the vulnerability applies when attachments exceed this limit)
  4. Inspect bypass rules or exclusions
    Review the POP3 proxy policy rules and any configured exceptions or bypass lists to see if large attachments are explicitly excluded from scanning
    Affected if Large attachments are excluded from AV scanning or there is a size threshold that causes oversized files to bypass the scanner entirely

You are affected if you are running Astaro Security Gateway v7.0 with the POP3 proxy enabled and a configured maximum attachment size limit, allowing oversized attachments to bypass virus scanning.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since ASG v7 is likely end-of-life with no patch available, implement compensating controls such as configuring an upstream/downstream mail server to scan oversized attachments, deploying endpoint anti-virus, or implementing a separate email security gateway with proper large-file handling. Consider upgrading to a supported Astaro/UTM solution if available.

Fix this in Security Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-4242 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-4242 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data