CVE-2007-5539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Cisco Unified Intelligent Contact Management Enterprise (ICME), Unified ICM Hosted (ICMH), Unified Contact Center Enterprise (UCCE), Unified Contact Center Hosted (UCCH), and System Unified Contact Center Enterprise (SUCCE) 7.1(5) allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges, and read reports or change the SUCCE configuration, via certain web interfaces, aka CSCsj55686.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnspecified vulnerability in Cisco Unified ICM/Contact Center web interfaces (versions 7.1(5)) allows remote authenticated users to escalate privileges, read reports, and modify SUCCE configuration. The exact attack vector is not disclosed but involves web interface flaws.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 7.1\(5\)all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Unified Contact Center software installationCheck system for installed Cisco Unified ICM/Contact Center components. Look for installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Cisco\ or check Windows Services for 'Cisco ICM' or 'Contact Center' services. Use 'wmic product get name,version' on Windows or check RPM packages on Linux if applicable.Affected if The software is installed and version 7.1(5) is found, or version cannot be determined but web interface is accessible
-
Verify web interface component is enabledCheck if the Cisco Unified Contact Center web interface (typically accessible via IIS on Windows) is running. Look for web services on ports 80/443 or check IIS Manager for 'CiscoICM' or 'UCCX' application pools. Review the configuration file web.config or equivalent for the web interface.Affected if The web interface service is running and accessible externally or to untrusted users
-
Confirm installed version against affected rangesRetrieve the exact version of Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise, Hosted, or ICM software. On Windows, right-click the application in Programs and Features, or check the version in the About section of the admin web console if accessible. Compare the version number to 7.1(5) and note that 'all versions' are listed as affected.Affected if Installed version is 7.1(5) or any version if the web interface is exposed and unpatched
-
Review web interface authentication and authorization settingsExamine the web interface configuration for user role assignments. Check the ICM Admin Workstation or Contact Center Administration web pages for user privilege levels. Look for configuration files in the web application directory that control authentication methods and role-based access controls.Affected if The web interface allows authenticated users to access privileged functions without proper separation or if any user can modify SUCCE configuration
If Cisco Unified Contact Center web interfaces are installed and accessible, and the version is 7.1(5) or unpatched, the environment is likely vulnerable to privilege escalation via the web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched Cisco Unified Contact Center version beyond 7.1(5) per Cisco's security advisories. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict web interface access to trusted networks and monitor for unauthorized privilege escalation.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation32.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $21,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-5539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-5539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data