Unified Contact Center EnterpriseApplication · Cisco

CVE-2017-6626

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-05-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Cisco Finesse Notification Service for Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise (UCCE) 11.5(1) and 11.6(1) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve information from agents using the Finesse Desktop. The vulnerability is due to the existence of a user account that has an undocumented, hard-coded password. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using the hard-coded credentials to subscribe to the Finesse Notification Service, which would allow the attacker to receive notifications when an agent signs in or out of the Finesse Desktop, when information about an agent changes, or when an agent's state changes. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc08314.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco Finesse Notification Service for UCCE versions 11.5(1) and 11.6(1) contains an undocumented, hard-coded user account with a static password. An unauthenticated remote attacker can leverage these credentials to subscribe to the Finesse Notification Service and receive real-time notifications about agent activities including sign-in/sign-out events, state changes, and other sensitive agent information.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for bug CSCvc08314 to remove or disable the hard-coded account. If no patch is available, contact Cisco TAC for specific remediation guidance.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Contact Center EnterpriseApplication
Affected:= 11.5\(1\)= 11.6\(1\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Finesse version
    Use the Cisco Finesse administration interface or CLI to retrieve the version number of the Cisco Finesse Notification Service for UCCE. Common methods include logging into the Finesse admin console or running version inquiry commands on the system.
    Affected if The installed version is 11.5(1) or 11.6(1)
  2. Confirm the Finesse Notification Service is exposed
    Determine if the Finesse Notification Service (typically listening on port 38001 or similar) is accessible from network locations where untrusted users could reach it. Check firewall rules and service binding configurations.
    Affected if The Notification Service is accessible to unauthenticated network attackers
  3. Check for the undocumented hard-coded account
    Inspect the system for the presence of the hard-coded account by reviewing user configuration files, database entries, or authentication logs for the undocumented username associated with the Finesse Notification Service.
    Affected if The hard-coded account exists in the system configuration

You are affected if your Cisco Finesse Notification Service for UCCE is version 11.5(1) or 11.6(1) and the undocumented hard-coded account is present, allowing unauthenticated subscription to agent notifications.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for bug CSCvc08314 to remove or disable the hard-coded account. If no patch is available, contact Cisco TAC for specific remediation guidance.

Fix this in Unified Contact Center Enterprise Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6626 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6626 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data