CVE-2007-5849
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger underflow in the asn1_get_string function in the SNMP back end (backend/snmp.c) for CUPS 1.2 through 1.3.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted SNMP response that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger underflow in the asn1_get_string function in CUPS' SNMP backend (backend/snmp.c) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted SNMP responses. The vulnerability affects CUPS versions 1.2 through 1.3.4 and triggers a stack-based buffer overflow, potentially giving attackers complete control of the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.2.4= 1.2.9= 1.2.10= 1.2.12= 1.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed CUPS versionRun 'cups-config --version' or check the CUPS package version via your system's package manager (dpkg -l cups, rpm -q cups, etc.)Affected if The version is 1.2.x or 1.3.x through 1.3.4 (including 1.2.4, 1.2.9, 1.2.10, 1.2.12, 1.3.3)
-
Locate the SNMP backend binaryCheck for the existence of backend/snmp.c compiled binary, typically at /usr/lib/cups/backend/snmp or /usr/libexec/cups/backend/snmpAffected if The SNMP backend binary exists in the CUPS backend directory
-
Verify SNMP backend is executableCheck file permissions with 'ls -la /usr/lib/cups/backend/snmp' (path may vary by OS)Affected if The SNMP backend exists and has execute permissions
-
Check CUPS configuration for SNMP discoveryInspect /etc/cups/cupsd.conf and /etc/cups/cups.conf for 'SNMP' directives or examine /etc/cups/printers.conf for any printers configured with SNMP backendAffected if CUPS is configured to use SNMP for printer discovery or any printers reference the snmp: backend in their device URI
-
Test SNMP backend availabilityRun 'lpinfo -v | grep snmp' to list SNMP-discovered devices or check if the backend responds to 'ipp://localhost/printers/' with SNMP queriesAffected if SNMP-based printer discovery is actively enabled and returning results
You are affected if your CUPS version falls between 1.2 and 1.3.4 (inclusive) and the SNMP backend is installed, enabled, or configured for printer discovery.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade CUPS to version 1.3.5 or later to patch the integer underflow vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, disable SNMP-based printer discovery in the CUPS configuration or block SNMP traffic at the network perimeter to reduce exposure.
CUPS version newer than 1.3.4 (e.g., 1.3.5 or latest stable)
- 1. Identify the current CUPS version installed on the system using 'cups-config --version' or 'dpkg -l | grep cups' / 'rpm -q cups'
- 2. If the installed version is 1.2.4, 1.2.9, 1.2.10, 1.2.12, or any version from 1.2.x through 1.3.4, the system is vulnerable
- 3. Upgrade CUPS to a version newer than 1.3.4 (e.g., 1.3.5 or later stable release) using the system's package manager
- 4. After upgrade, restart the CUPS service using 'service cups restart' or '/etc/init.d/cups restart'
- 5. Verify the new version is installed and the service is running properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-5849 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugs.gentoo.org
- docs.info.apple.com
- lists.apple.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.cups.org
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.novell.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-5849 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data