CVE-2008-0467
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in Firebird before 2.0.4, and 2.1.x before 2.1.0 RC1, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFirebird database server versions before 2.0.4 and 2.1.x before 2.1.0 RC1 contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the authentication module. The vulnerability is triggered by providing an excessively long username during database connection, allowing remote attackers to overwrite stack memory and execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the database service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.3<= 2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Firebird database server is installedCheck common installation paths: on Linux/Unix look in /opt/firebird, /usr/local/firebird, or check for process 'fbserver' or 'firebird' running. On Windows check services list for 'Firebird Server' or look in Program Files\Firebird. Query the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Firebird Project\Firebird Server\Instances for the installation path.Affected if Firebird server is installed and running on the system
-
Determine the installed Firebird versionIf Firebird is installed, locate the version: on Linux/Unix check the 'IBVER' file in the installation directory, or run 'fbserver -version' or 'firebird -version'. On Windows check the version property of fbserver.exe in the bin folder, or look at the version info in the service properties.Affected if The version number is 2.0.3 or lower, or is 2.1.0 before Release Candidate 1 (such as 2.1.0 beta or 2.1.0 alpha versions)
-
Verify if remote network connections are enabledCheck the firebird.conf configuration file (usually in the Firebird installation directory) for 'RemoteServicePort' (default 3050) and 'RemoteBindAddress'. Also check if the Windows Firewall or iptables allows incoming connections on port 3050. Verify that the database is configured to accept TCP/IP connections rather than only local connections.Affected if Port 3050 (or the configured Firebird port) is open to the network and accepting remote connections
-
Confirm authentication is being usedCheck the security2.fdb database or the firebird.conf for the 'AuthServer' and 'AuthClient' settings. The vulnerability exists in the legacy authentication module, so verify the server is using the default authentication mechanism for user logins.Affected if The default legacy authentication is in use (not using only pluggable authentication modules introduced in later versions)
You are affected if Firebird server is installed with version 2.0.3 or lower, or version 2.1.0 before RC1, and the service is accessible over the network on the default port.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Firebird to version 2.0.4 or later, or 2.1.0 RC1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks and implement IP-based access controls on the database port (default 3050).
Firebird 2.0.4 or later / Firebird 2.1.0 RC1 or later
- Identify the currently installed Firebird version (e.g., run 'fbversion' or check the installation directory).
- Backup all Firebird databases and configuration files.
- Download Firebird 2.0.4 or later (or the 2.1.0 RC1 / later stable release) from the official Firebird website.
- Stop the Firebird server service.
- Install the new version, overwriting the existing binaries.
- Restart the Firebird server service.
- Verify the version and test that the server accepts connections with the new build.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0467 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data