CVE-2008-2136
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory leak in the ipip6_rcv function in net/ipv6/sit.c in the Linux kernel 2.4 before 2.4.36.5 and 2.6 before 2.6.25.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via network traffic to a Simple Internet Transition (SIT) tunnel interface, related to the pskb_may_pull and kfree_skb functions, and management of an skb reference count.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory leak in the Linux kernel's IPv6 SIT (Simple Internet Transition) tunnel handling in the ipip6_rcv function in net/ipv6/sit.c. Improper management of skb (socket buffer) reference counts when using pskb_may_pull and kfree_skb causes memory to not be freed properly when processing network traffic to SIT tunnel interfaces, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.36.5>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.25.3= 4.0= 6.06= 7.04= 7.10= 8.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to display the currently running kernel versionAffected if The version is less than 2.4.36.5 for 2.4 series, or less than 2.6.25.3 for 2.6 series (including 2.6.x versions before 2.6.25.3)
-
Verify if the SIT module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep sit' or check /proc/modules for the sit moduleAffected if The SIT module is loaded (the vulnerability exists in the sit.ko module or compiled-in kernel code)
-
Check for active SIT tunnel interfacesRun 'ip -6 tunnel show' or check 'ip link' for sit-type interfaces such as 'sit0'Affected if SIT tunnel interfaces exist (particularly sit0 or other manually configured SIT tunnels)
-
Check if IPv6 is enabledRun 'cat /proc/net/if_inet6' or check if IPv6 is listed in 'ip -6 addr show'Affected if IPv6 is enabled (SIT tunneling is used for IPv6 over IPv4, so IPv6 must be active)
-
Monitor for memory growth in skb allocationsCheck kernel memory usage over time using 'cat /proc/meminfo' or monitor 'Slab:' or 'SReclaimable:' values, or inspect 'dmesg' for kernel memory warningsAffected if Memory usage steadily increases without being freed, indicating the leak is being triggered by SIT traffic
You are affected if your kernel version is less than 2.4.36.5 or less than 2.6.25.3, and SIT tunneling (IPv6 over IPv4) is enabled and actively processing traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.4.36.52.6.25.3
Upgrade Linux kernel to version 2.4.36.5 or later for the 2.4 series, or 2.6.25.3 or later for the 2.6 series. Alternatively, apply the specific patch addressing the skb reference count issue in the ipip6_rcv function.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-2136 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- kernel.org
- www.kernel.org
- www.kernel.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- support.avaya.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- www.redhat.com
- wiki.rpath.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-2136 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data