CVE-2008-2358
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in the dccp_feat_change function in net/dccp/feat.c in the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.18, and 2.6.17 through 2.6.20, allows local users to gain privileges via an invalid feature length, which leads to a heap-based buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow in the DCCP subsystem's dccp_feat_change function allows local attackers to trigger a heap-based buffer overflow via invalid feature length values, enabling privilege escalation to root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.6.17= 2.6.18= 2.6.19= 2.6.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the running kernel versionAffected if The version matches 2.6.17, 2.6.18, 2.6.19, or 2.6.20 exactly
-
Verify DCCP kernel module statusRun 'lsmod | grep dccp' to see if the DCCP module is currently loadedAffected if The dccp module appears in the loaded module list
-
Check if DCCP is built into the kernelRun 'cat /proc/config.gz' 2>/dev/null | gunzip | grep -i dccp, or check /boot/config-$(uname -r) for CONFIG_IP_DCCP=yAffected if CONFIG_IP_DCCP=y is set (DCCP compiled into the kernel)
-
Verify DCCP module availabilityRun 'modinfo dccp' or check /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/net/dccp* files for existenceAffected if The DCCP module files exist in the kernel modules directory
You are affected if your kernel version is 2.6.17 through 2.6.20 and the DCCP protocol is either loaded as a module or compiled into the kernel (the vulnerability requires DCCP to be available for exploitation).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the upstream kernel patch for CVE-2008-2358 or upgrade to a kernel version beyond 2.6.20 that contains the fix; alternatively, disable DCCP via kernel configuration if not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-2358 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-2358 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data