Imlib2Application · Carsten Haitzler

CVE-2008-2426

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-06-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Imlib 2 (aka imlib2) 1.4.0 allow user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) a PNM image with a crafted header, related to the load function in src/modules/loaders/loader_pnm.c; or (2) a crafted XPM image, related to the load function in src/modules/loader_xpm.c.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflows in imlib2 1.4.0 image loading functions for PNM and XPM formats allow arbitrary code execution when processing specially crafted image files with malformed headers.

MitigationUpdate imlib2 to a patched version or patch the bounds-checking in loader_pnm.c and loader_xpm.c; avoid opening untrusted PNM/XPM images until remediated.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Imlib2Application
Affected:= 1.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed imlib2 version
    Run 'imlib2-config --version' or check package manager (dpkg -l libimlib2, rpm -qi imlib2, etc.)
    Affected if Version is 1.4.0 exactly
  2. Locate imlib2 loader modules
    Find libimlib2 loader files - typically in /usr/lib/imlib2/loaders/ or /usr/lib64/imlib2/loaders/
    Affected if loader_pnm.so or loader_xpm.so files exist in the loaders directory
  3. Verify PNM image loader is present
    List loader directory contents and confirm loader_pnm.so (or .la) exists
    Affected if PNM loader module is present and loadable by the imlib2 library
  4. Verify XPM image loader is present
    List loader directory contents and confirm loader_xpm.so (or .la) exists
    Affected if XPM loader module is present and loadable by the imlib2 library

Environment is affected if imlib2 version is exactly 1.4.0 AND either the PNM or XPM image loader module is present and functional.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update imlib2 to a patched version or patch the bounds-checking in loader_pnm.c and loader_xpm.c; avoid opening untrusted PNM/XPM images until remediated.

Recommended fix High confidence

imlib2 version 1.4.1 or later (upgrading to the latest stable release recommended)

  1. 1. Identify the current imlib2 version installed on the system using package manager (e.g., dpkg -l | grep imlib2, rpm -qa | grep imlib2, or pkg-config --modversion imlib2)
  2. 2. Update system package repository metadata
  3. 3. Upgrade imlib2 package using the appropriate package manager (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get install libimlib2-dev, yum update imlib2, or dnf update imlib2)
  4. 4. Rebuild any applications that dynamically link against imlib2 to ensure they use the updated library
  5. 5. Verify the new version is installed correctly (e.g., pkg-config --modversion imlib2)
Caveat Minimal risk - point release upgrade within same major version typically maintains API/ABI compatibility

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Imlib2 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-2426 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-2426 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data