CVE-2008-6079
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedimlib2 before 1.4.2 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted (1) ARGB, (2) BMP, (3) JPEG, (4) LBM, (5) PNM, (6) TGA, or (7) XPM file, related to "several heap and stack based buffer overflows - partly due to integer overflows."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceimlib2 before 1.4.2 contains multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in its image file parsing code for ARGB, BMP, JPEG, LBM, PNM, TGA, and XPM formats. The vulnerabilities are caused by integer overflows that lead to heap and stack-based buffer overflows when processing crafted image files, allowing context-dependent attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.4.1= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.1= 1.1.1= 1.1.2= 1.2.1= 1.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify imlib2 is installedRun 'pkg-config --modversion imlib2' or check for the library file (typically libimlib2.so) in /usr/lib or /usr/lib64Affected if imlib2 is not found, the system is not affected by this CVE
-
Determine the installed imlib2 versionUse 'imlib2-config --version' or check the package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q imlib2' for RHEL-based systems, 'dpkg -l libimlib2' for Debian-based)Affected if version cannot be determined or is older than 1.4.2
-
Compare installed version against affected rangeCompare the version found in step 2 to the affected versions: 1.0 through 1.2.2, 1.0.x series, 1.1.x series, 1.2.x series, or any version <= 1.4.1Affected if the installed version matches any of these affected versions (1.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4, 1.0.5, 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, or <=1.4.1)
-
Identify if vulnerable image formats are processedReview applications or services that use imlib2 to load user-supplied or network-supplied image files in any of these formats: ARGB, BMP, JPEG, LBM, PNM, TGA, or XPMAffected if applications process these image formats from untrusted sources and imlib2 version is affected
The environment is affected if imlib2 version 1.4.1 or earlier (including 1.0.x, 1.1.x, and 1.2.x series) is installed and used to process image files in ARGB, BMP, JPEG, LBM, PNM, TGA, or XPM formats.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade imlib2 to version 1.4.2 or later to patch the vulnerabilities. Avoid processing untrusted or unknown image files with vulnerable versions until the upgrade is applied.
1.4.2 or later
- Check the currently installed version of imlib2 using your system's package manager or by running 'imlib2_config --version' or checking your package database
- Upgrade imlib2 to version 1.4.2 or later. For Debian/Ubuntu systems: run 'apt-get update && apt-get install libimlib2' or 'apt-get upgrade libimlib2'. For Red Hat/Fedora systems: run 'yum update imlib2' or 'dnf update imlib2'. For source compilation: download imlib2 1.4.2 or later from the official source and compile with standard ./configure && make && make install
- Verify the new version is installed by running 'imlib2_config --version' or checking the package version again
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-6079 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-6079 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data