CVE-2008-3081
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified "input validation" vulnerabilities in the Web management interface (aka Messaging Administration interface) in Avaya Message Storage Server (MSS) 3.x and 4.0, and possibly Communication Manager 3.1.x, allow remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary commands as user vexvm via vectors related to (1) SFTP Remote Store configuration; (2) remote FTP storage settings; (3) name server lookup; (4) pinging another host; (5) TCP/IP Networking parameter configuration; (6) the external hosts configuration main page; (7) adding and changing external hosts; (8) Windows domain parameter configuration; (9) date, time, and NTP server configuration; (10) alarm settings; (11) the command line history form; (12) the maintenance form; and (13) the server events form.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple input validation vulnerabilities in the Avaya Message Storage Server (MSS) web management interface allow authenticated remote administrators to execute arbitrary commands as the vexvm user. The vulnerabilities exist across 13 different configuration forms including SFTP, FTP storage, name server, ping, TCP/IP networking, external hosts, Windows domain, date/time/NTP, alarm settings, command history, maintenance, and server events forms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3= 3.1= 4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Avaya Messaging Storage Server is installedIdentify whether the Avaya Messaging Storage Server software is present on the target system. Check installed programs or look for Avaya MSS processes or services.Affected if The system has Avaya Messaging Storage Server software installed
-
Confirm the installed versionDetermine the exact version of Avaya Messaging Storage Server installed. Compare against affected versions: 3, 3.1, and 4.0Affected if The installed version is 3, 3.1, or 4.0
-
Check if the web management interface is enabledInspect whether the MSS web management interface (typically on port 8080 or 8443) is accessible and active on the system. Look for HTTP/HTTPS services running on typical web management ports for this application.Affected if The web management interface is exposed and accessible
-
Verify administrative access to the web interfaceDetermine if valid administrator credentials exist for the MSS web management console. This vulnerability requires authenticated administrative access to exploit.Affected if Administrative credentials for the MSS web interface are configured or accessible
A system is affected if it runs Avaya Messaging Storage Server versions 3, 3.1, or 4.0 with the web management interface enabled and accessible to an authenticated administrator.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches if available; if no patch exists, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the management interface to trusted administrative networks only and consider disabling the web management interface until a fix is available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-3081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- osvdb.org
- support.avaya.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-3081 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data