CVE-2008-3108
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in Sun Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in JDK and JRE 5.0 before Update 10, SDK and JRE 1.4.x before 1.4.2_18, and SDK and JRE 1.3.x before 1.3.1_23 allows context-dependent attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors related to font processing.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Sun Java Runtime Environment's font processing subsystem affecting JDK/JRE 5.0 before Update 10, SDK/JRE 1.4.x before 1.4.2_18, and SDK/JRE 1.3.x before 1.3.1_23. Allows context-dependent attackers to gain elevated privileges through unspecified font processing vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.3.1= 1.3.1_2= 1.3.1_03= 1.3.1_04= 1.3.1_05= 1.3.1_06= 1.3.1_07= 1.3.1_08= 1.3.1_09= 1.3.1_10= 1.3.1_11= 1.3.1_12= 1.5.0= 1.3.1= 1.3.1_01= 1.3.1_01a= 1.3.1_02= 1.3.1_03= 1.3.1_04= 1.3.1_05= 1.3.1_06= 1.3.1_07= 1.3.1_08= 1.3.1_09= 1.3.1_10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'javac -version' from command line to obtain the exact version stringAffected if Version is 1.3.1 through 1.3.1_12, 1.4.x before 1.4.2_18, or 1.5.0 before Update 10
-
Check Java product vendor and buildExamine the version output for 'Sun Microsystems' or 'Sun' vendor information, and note the full version string including update number (e.g., _01, _02)Affected if Product is Sun JDK, JRE, or SDK from the affected version branches
-
Locate Java installation directoryCheck JAVA_HOME environment variable or search common paths like /usr/lib/jvm, C:\Program Files\Java for Windows, or /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines for MacAffected if The installation directory contains vulnerable Sun Java runtime libraries (lib/fontmanager, jre/lib/fonts) from affected version ranges
-
Verify font processing is in useInspect running Java applications for font rendering operations - check process command lines for GUI applications using AWT/Swing, or review application logs for font loading activityAffected if Any Java application using AWT, Swing, or Java2D font rendering is active, as the vulnerability lies in the font processing subsystem
-
Review font configuration filesCheck Java font configuration in jre/lib/font.properties or jre/lib/fontconfig.properties for custom font pathsAffected if Custom font configurations are present that could load malicious or specially crafted font files into the vulnerable processing path
Environment is affected if Sun Java JDK/JRE/SDK version from the 1.3.1, 1.4.x, or 1.5.0 branches matches the vulnerable ranges and any Java application using font rendering is executing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Java versions beyond the vulnerable releases (JRE 5.0 Update 10+, 1.4.2_18+, 1.3.1_23+) or migrate to a currently supported Java version with active security maintenance.
JDK/JRE 1.5.0 Update 10+ or SDK/JRE 1.3.1_23+ (consider migrating to a supported LTS release like JDK 8 or 11 as these older versions are EOL)
- 1. Identify all systems running the affected Java versions (JRE 1.3.1 through 1.3.1_04, JDK 1.5.0, SDK 1.3.1 through 1.3.1_02)
- 2. Download and install the appropriate patched Java version for your deployment: For JDK/JRE 1.5.0, upgrade to Update 10 or later; For SDK/JRE 1.3.x, upgrade to version 1.3.1_23 or later
- 3. Verify the installed Java version by running 'java -version' to confirm the update was applied
- 4. Test all critical applications to ensure compatibility with the updated Java version
- 5. Remove older vulnerable Java installations from all systems
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-3108 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- lists.apple.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.avaya.com
- support.avaya.com
- support.nortel.com
- support.nortel.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- www.vmware.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-3108 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data