CVE-2008-3465
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in an API in GDI in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, and Server 2008 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via a WMF file with a malformed file-size parameter, which would not be properly handled by a third-party application that uses this API for a copy operation, aka "GDI Heap Overflow Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in the GDI (Graphics Device Interface) API in Windows allows remote code execution through specially crafted WMF (Windows Metafile) files with malformed file-size parameters. The vulnerability is triggered when third-party applications use the GDI API for copy operations without properly validating the file-size parameter, causing a heap overflow that can lead to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= goldall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' from the Start menu Run dialog, or use 'systeminfo' from command line, or check System Properties (Right-click My Computer > Properties). Look for Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, or Windows Server 2008.Affected if The installed Windows version is one of: Windows 2000 (all), Windows XP (all), Windows Server 2003 (all), Windows Vista (all), Windows Server 2008 (all).
-
Verify if security patch MS08-046 is installedOpen Control Panel > Add or Remove Programs, check 'Show updates' box, and look for 'Security Update for Microsoft Windows (KB950759)' or 'MS08-046'. Alternatively, run 'wmic qfe list' from command line and search for KB950759.Affected if The security update KB950759 (MS08-046) is NOT installed or listed in the installed updates.
-
Check for third-party applications that process WMF filesReview installed software for applications that handle graphics, documents, or images which may process Windows Metafile (WMF) format. Check application logs or recent file access for .wmf file processing activity.Affected if Third-party applications that process WMF files are installed and actively used on the system.
The system is affected if it runs an unpatched Windows version among Windows 2000, XP, 2003, Vista, or Server 2008, and processes WMF files through applications that use the GDI API without the MS08-046 security update applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability; third-party applications using the GDI API must implement proper validation of WMF file-size parameters before copy operations; consider restricting WMF file processing in untrusted applications until patches are applied.
Windows 10/11 or Windows Server 2019/2022 (any currently supported version)
- Upgrade to a supported Windows version. Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 reached end of support on April 11, 2017. Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 reached end of support on April 8, 2014. Windows 2000 reached end of support on July 13, 2010.
- Identify the current operational requirements and select an appropriate supported Windows version (e.g., Windows 10, Windows 11, or Windows Server 2019/2022).
- Plan and execute migration to the selected supported Windows version.
- After migration, ensure Windows Update is enabled and all latest security updates are installed.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-3465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-3465 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data