CVE-2008-4539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in the Cirrus VGA implementation in (1) KVM before kvm-82 and (2) QEMU on Debian GNU/Linux and Ubuntu might allow local users to gain privileges by using the VNC console for a connection, aka the LGD-54XX "bitblt" heap overflow. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2007-1320.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in the Cirrus VGA graphics adapter emulation in QEMU and KVM. The vulnerability exists in the bitblt (bit block transfer) operation for the LGD-54XX display adapter. Local users can exploit this via the VNC console to gain elevated privileges. This issue is a regression from an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-1320.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.04= 8.10= 4.0= 5.0<= 81< 0.10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QEMU or KVM installation and versionRun 'qemu --version' or 'kvm --version' to determine the installed version. On Debian/Ubuntu, also check with 'dpkg -l | grep -E "qemu|kvm"'Affected if The installed version is QEMU < 0.10.0, or KVM <= 81, or the package version corresponds to Ubuntu 8.04/8.10 or Debian 4.0/5.0
-
Confirm Cirrus VGA emulation is in useExamine the QEMU/KVM command line or configuration files for the '-vga cirrus' option, or check VM XML configuration for '<graphics type='vga' model='cirrus'>'Affected if The virtual machine is configured with Cirrus VGA ('-vga cirrus' or cirrus model) as the graphics adapter
-
Verify VNC access is enabledCheck the QEMU/KVM command line for '-vnc' option, or examine VM configuration for VNC graphics type. Look for listening VNC ports with 'netstat -tlnp | grep vnc' or 'ss -tlnp | grep vnc'Affected if VNC is enabled and accessible, exposing the graphics console over the network or to untrusted users
-
Confirm the LGD-54XX bitblt operation is activeThis is implicit when Cirrus VGA runs with VNC; the vulnerability triggers during bit block transfer operations in the Cirrus emulated hardware. No specific command needed if steps 1-3 indicate exposureAffected if All three conditions are true: vulnerable QEMU/KVM version + Cirrus VGA + VNC access exposed to untrusted users
A system is affected if it runs QEMU < 0.10.0 or KVM <= 81 with Cirrus VGA emulation enabled and VNC access exposed, particularly on Ubuntu 8.04/8.10 or Debian 4.0/5.0 systems.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data0.10.0
Upgrade KVM to version kvm-82 or later, and apply vendor patches for affected Debian/Ubuntu systems. Restrict VNC access to trusted users and apply least-privilege principles to limit exposure.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- groups.google.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- svn.savannah.gnu.org
- www.debian.org
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- launchpad.net
- www.redhat.com
- git.kernel.dk
- www.mail-archive.com
- www.mail-archive.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data