CVE-2008-4576
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsctp in Linux kernel before 2.6.25.18 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (OOPS) via an INIT-ACK that states the peer does not support AUTH, which causes the sctp_process_init function to clean up active transports and triggers the OOPS when the T1-Init timer expires.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) implementation in Linux kernels prior to 2.6.25.18 contains a denial of service vulnerability. When a remote attacker sends a malicious INIT-ACK message claiming the peer does not support AUTH, the sctp_process_init function improperly cleans up active transports, causing a kernel OOPS when the T1-Init timer subsequently expires.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.6.25.17= 2.2.27= 2.4.36= 2.4.36.1= 2.4.36.2= 2.4.36.3= 2.4.36.4= 2.4.36.5= 2.4.36.6= 2.6= 2.6.18= 2.6.19.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the running kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to obtain the kernel version stringAffected if The kernel version is <= 2.6.25.17, or exactly matches 2.2.27, 2.4.36.x (any patchlevel), 2.6, 2.6.18, or 2.6.19.4 from the affected list
-
Verify if SCTP support is enabled in the kernelCheck for the SCTP module with `lsmod | grep sctp` or check kernel config at `/boot/config-$(uname -r)` for CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m or CONFIG_IP_SCTP=yAffected if SCTP is loaded as a module or compiled into the kernel (CONFIG_IP_SCTP is set)
-
Detect active SCTP endpoints on the systemRun `ss -s` or examine `/proc/net/sctp/eps` to list active SCTP endpoints, or use `netstat -an | grep sctp` to find listening SCTP portsAffected if Any SCTP endpoints are listening or established - the system is actively using SCTP protocol
The system is affected only if it runs a vulnerable kernel version from the affected list AND has SCTP protocol support enabled and in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the upstream kernel patch or upgrade to Linux kernel 2.6.25.18 or later. As a compensating control, disable SCTP protocol support in the kernel if not required, or restrict network exposure of SCTP endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4576 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- kernel.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- permalink.gmane.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.gossamer-threads.com
- www.kernel.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4576 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data