CVE-2008-5709
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the web management interface in Avaya Communication Manager (CM) 3.1 before 3.1.4 SP2, 4.0 before 4.0.3 SP1, and 5.0 before 5.0 SP3 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unknown attack vectors in the (1) Set Static Routes and (2) Backup History components.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Avaya Communication Manager web management interface. The flaw exists in the Set Static Routes and Backup History components, allowing remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified attack vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.1.3= 3.1.4= 4.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.3= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Avaya Communication Manager versionAccess the system via CLI or administration interface and run the command to display the CM version (typically via 'version' or 'show system' command in the maintenance shell)Affected if The displayed version matches 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 4.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.3, or 5.0 exactly
-
Confirm web management interface is enabledCheck the system configuration for the web-based management interface status, typically accessible via port 443 or 8443 on the CM serverAffected if The web management interface is enabled and accessible on the network
-
Verify access to vulnerable componentsLog into the web management interface and navigate to the 'Set Static Routes' and 'Backup History' sections under the administration or network configuration areasAffected if These components are present and accessible within the web interface without additional security restrictions
-
Assess network exposure of management interfaceReview firewall rules, ACLs, or network segmentation to determine if the web management interface is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if The web management interface is exposed to networks beyond trusted administration segments
A system is affected if it runs an affected CM version (3.1.x, 4.0.x, or 5.0) with the web management interface enabled and the Set Static Routes or Backup History components accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches: upgrade to CM 3.1.4 SP2, 4.0.3 SP1, or 5.0 SP3 or later. Until patched, restrict network access to the management interface to trusted networks only and minimize the number of authenticated users with access.
Avaya Communication Manager 3.1.4 SP2 or later (for 3.x line); note that versions 4.0 before 4.0.3 SP1 and 5.0 before 5.0 SP3 are also affected
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Avaya Communication Manager via the web management interface or CLI
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- 3. Perform a complete backup of the current Communication Manager configuration
- 4. Download Avaya Communication Manager version 3.1.4 SP2 (or later recommended version) from Avaya support portal
- 5. Apply the upgrade package following Avaya's documented upgrade procedures for the web management interface
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number in the system
- 7. Test the Set Static Routes and Backup History components in the web management interface to confirm proper functionality
- 8. Verify that the system is no longer vulnerable to the input validation issues
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-5709 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-5709 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data