Communication ManagerApplication · Avaya

CVE-2008-6575

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-04-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in the SIP server in SIP Enablement Services (SES) in Avaya Communication Manager 3.1.x and 4.x allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via unknown vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Denial of service vulnerability in Avaya Communication Manager's SIP Enablement Services (SES) allows remote authenticated users to cause excessive resource consumption via unspecified vectors in the SIP server component.

MitigationApply available vendor patches for Avaya Communication Manager 3.1.x and 4.x; if patches unavailable, restrict SES access to essential authenticated users only and implement network-level rate limiting on SIP ports.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Communication ManagerApplication
Affected:= 3.1= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.1.3= 3.1.4= 3.1.5= 4.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Avaya Communication Manager installation
    Check system for Avaya Communication Manager by reviewing installed software packages or checking for Avaya binaries in typical installation directories (e.g., /opt/avaya, C:\Avaya, or vendor-specific paths). Use command 'ls /opt/avaya' on Unix or check Programs and Features on Windows if accessible.
    Affected if Avaya Communication Manager software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed CM version
    Run version check command specific to Avaya CM - typically via 'version' command in CM admin interface, or check /etc/ release files, or review Avaya license/management interface for CM version information.
    Affected if Installed version matches 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 4.0, 4.0.1, or 4.0.3
  3. Verify SIP Enablement Services (SES) is enabled
    Check CM configuration for SIP Enablement Services status - typically via CM administration interface under Server or Telephony Services settings, or check for ses daemon/process running on the system.
    Affected if SES component is loaded and active on the server
  4. Confirm SES network exposure
    Check if SIP ports (typically UDP/TCP 5060 and 5061) are listening on network interfaces accessible to remote users. Use 'netstat -an | grep 5060' or similar network scanning tools to identify exposed SIP listeners.
    Affected if SIP ports are open and reachable from network, allowing remote authenticated access

A user is affected if Avaya Communication Manager versions 3.1.x or 4.0.x are installed with SIP Enablement Services enabled and exposed to the network where remote authenticated users can send SIP requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available vendor patches for Avaya Communication Manager 3.1.x and 4.x; if patches unavailable, restrict SES access to essential authenticated users only and implement network-level rate limiting on SIP ports.

Fix this in Communication Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-6575 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-6575 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data