CVE-2009-0059
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC), Cisco Catalyst 6500 Wireless Services Module (WiSM), and Cisco Catalyst 3750 Integrated Wireless LAN Controller with software 4.x before 4.2.176.0 and 5.2.x before 5.2.157.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a web authentication (aka WebAuth) session that includes a malformed POST request to login.html.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers, WiSM, and Catalyst 3750 Integrated Wireless LAN Controllers allows remote attackers to cause device reload by sending a malformed POST request to login.html during web authentication (WebAuth). The vulnerability affects software versions 4.x before 4.2.176.0 and 5.x before 5.2.157.0.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1= 4.2= 5.2= 4.1= 4.2= 5.2= 4.1= 4.2= 5.2= 4.1= 4.2= 5.2= 4.1= 4.2= 5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WLC software versionLog into the Cisco Wireless LAN Controller CLI and run the command 'show version' to display the installed software version. Alternatively, access the WLC web interface and check the controller summary page for the software version.Affected if The installed version is 4.x before 4.2.176.0, or 5.x before 5.2.157.0
-
Confirm the controller modelUse the CLI command 'show inventory' or check the web interface controller summary to identify the exact WLC model (Cisco 4400, Catalyst 3750/6500/7600 Series Integrated WLC).Affected if The controller is any of the models listed in the affected products for version 4.1, 4.2, or 5.2
-
Verify WebAuth feature statusIn the WLC CLI, run 'show run-config auth-list' or access the web interface under Security > Web Authentication to check if Web Authentication is enabled on any WLANs or the controller.Affected if WebAuth is enabled and the controller is running a vulnerable software version
-
Check web interface accessibilityConfirm that the WLC web management interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is enabled and accessible by attempting to reach the login.html page or checking via CLI command 'show web-auth enabled'.Affected if Web interface is enabled on a vulnerable version, allowing the malformed POST request to trigger the DoS
The environment is affected if the controller runs software version 4.x before 4.2.176.0 or 5.x before 5.2.157.0 AND has Web Authentication enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco WLC software to version 4.2.176.0 or later for 4.x branches, or 5.2.157.0 or later for 5.x branches to remediate this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0059 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0059 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data