CVE-2009-0061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) TSEC driver in the Cisco 4400 WLC, Cisco Catalyst 6500 and 7600 Wireless Services Module (WiSM), and Cisco Catalyst 3750 Integrated Wireless LAN Controller with software 4.x before 4.2.176.0 and 5.x before 5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash or hang) via unknown IP packets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) TSEC driver allows remote attackers to send specially crafted IP packets to affected devices, causing a denial of service via device crash or hang. The vulnerability affects Cisco 4400 WLC, WiSM modules, and Catalyst 3750 Integrated WLC running software versions 4.x prior to 4.2.176.0 and 5.x prior to 5.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0= 4.1= 4.2= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco WLC device in your environmentInventory your network for Cisco 4400 Wireless LAN Controllers, Catalyst 3750/6500/7600 series Integrated WLCs, or other Cisco WLC devices. Use network scans or asset management tools to find these devices.Affected if Any of these Cisco WLC models are present in your environment
-
Retrieve the software version from the WLCAccess the WLC CLI and run 'show version' or access the web interface and check the controller summary page to obtain the installed software version.Affected if The displayed version is 4.1.x, 4.2.x prior to 4.2.176.0, or 5.0.x
-
Confirm the exact version number for 4.2 branchIf the version shows 4.2.x, run 'show version' or check the web interface to identify the precise build. Compare against 4.2.176.0 - versions below this are affected.Affected if The version is 4.2.x and the build number is less than 176.0
-
Verify IP network access to the WLCConfirm that the WLC management or service-port interface has an IP address and is reachable on the network. Use 'show interface' on the CLI to check IP configuration.Affected if The WLC has a routable IP address and accepts IP traffic (this makes the device exploitable)
You are affected if you have a Cisco 4400 WLC, Catalyst 3750/6500/7600 Integrated WLC, or other Cisco WLC running software version 4.1.x, 4.2.x prior to 4.2.176.0, or 5.0.x with network accessibility.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco WLC software to version 4.2.176.0 or later for 4.x branches, or 5.1 or later for 5.x branches. Prior to upgrade, verify backup configurations and plan maintenance window given critical role of wireless controllers in network infrastructure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data