CVE-2009-0091
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, and 3.5 does not properly enforce a certain type-equality constraint in .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft .NET Framework Type Verification Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, and 3.5 where type-equality constraints in verifiable code are not properly enforced. This allows specially crafted XBAP browser applications, ASP.NET applications, or .NET Framework applications to bypass type safety checks and achieve arbitrary code execution with full user privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 1.1= 2.0= 3.5= 1.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed .NET Framework versionOpen Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v2.0.50727 (for .NET 2.0) or v3.5 (for .NET 3.5). Check the 'Version' value in the 'Install' subkey. Alternatively, run 'reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP" /s /v Version' from command prompt.Affected if The installed version is 2.0, 2.0 SP1, or 3.5 without security patches
-
Verify if XBAP browser application support is enabledCheck Internet Explorer security settings. In IE, go to Internet Options > Security > Custom Level > .NET Framework-related settings. Look for 'Enable XAML Browser Applications' or 'Allow XBAP' option. Also check Windows Features for .NET Framework 3.0 (which includes XBAP support).Affected if XBAP support is enabled and .NET Framework 2.0/3.5 unpatched version is installed
-
Confirm ASP.NET is installed and enabledCheck for ASP.NET in IIS (run inetmgr) or look for ASP.NET version in C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\{version}\aspnet_isapi.dll. Also verify ASP.NET is registered with IIS using 'aspnet_regiis -lk'.Affected if ASP.NET is installed and running on an unpatched .NET Framework 2.0/3.5 installation
-
Check Windows version and .NET Framework installationRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt to identify the Windows version. Then cross-reference with the .NET Framework version found in Step 1.Affected if Running Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, Server 2008, Vista, or Windows 7 with unpatched .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, or 3.5
The environment is affected if .NET Framework version 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.0 SP1, or 3.5 is installed without Microsoft security patches, and XBAP or ASP.NET features are in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patches for the affected .NET Framework versions and conduct compatibility testing with existing applications, particularly those utilizing XBAP or ASP.NET components.
Apply Microsoft Security Update MS09-036 (patches for .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP1/SP2, and 3.5)
- 1. Identify the exact installed version of .NET Framework by checking the Windows registry or using the Microsoft .NET Framework Setup Verification Tool
- 2. Determine the applicable Microsoft security bulletin - this vulnerability was addressed in MS09-036
- 3. For .NET Framework 1.0 SP3 on Windows XP/2000: apply KB967617
- 4. For .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 on all supported Windows versions: apply KB967618
- 5. For .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 on all supported Windows versions: apply KB967612
- 6. For .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 on all supported Windows versions: apply KB974417
- 7. For .NET Framework 3.5 on all supported Windows versions: apply KB974418 (includes fixes for .NET 2.0 SP1 components)
- 8. Download the applicable patch from Microsoft Update Catalog or use Windows Update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0091 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0091 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data