Pam Krb5Application · Eyrie

CVE-2009-0360

MEDIUM · 6.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-02-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.12 or later.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Russ Allbery pam-krb5 before 3.13, when linked against MIT Kerberos, does not properly initialize the Kerberos libraries for setuid use, which allows local users to gain privileges by pointing an environment variable to a modified Kerberos configuration file, and then launching a PAM-based setuid application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

pam-krb5 before version 3.13, when linked against MIT Kerberos, fails to properly initialize Kerberos libraries for setuid use. This allows local privilege escalation by pointing an environment variable (likely KRB5_CONFIG) to a user-controlled Kerberos configuration file, then triggering a PAM-based setuid application to load the malicious config.

MitigationUpgrade pam-krb5 to version 3.13 or later which contains proper setuid initialization. Alternatively, audit systems to ensure untrusted users cannot control Kerberos configuration file locations before PAM-based setuid applications execute.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pam Krb5Application
Affected:<= 3.12= 2.0= 2.1= 2.2= 2.3= 2.4= 2.5= 2.6= 3.0= 3.1= 3.2= 3.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify pam-krb5 version
    Run 'rpm -q pam-krb5' or 'dpkg -l libpam-krb5' to find the installed package version. If compiled from source, check the binary with 'strings' for version strings or check the source directory.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.12 or earlier, or any of these specific versions: 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3
  2. Find PAM-based setuid applications
    Locate setuid binaries on the system with 'find / -perm -4000 -type f 2>/dev/null', then check which ones use PAM by examining /etc/pam.d/ configuration files for the service or by running 'ldd' on the binary to see if it links against libpam.
    Affected if Any setuid application is configured to use pam-krb5 via PAM configuration in /etc/pam.d/ or directly links to the pam-krb5 library
  3. Check for dangerous environment variable handling
    Inspect if pam-krb5 strips the KRB5_CONFIG environment variable before use. This can be confirmed by reviewing the source code of the installed version, or by testing whether a non-root user can influence Kerberos configuration path through environment variables when invoking a setuid PAM application.
    Affected if The pam-krb5 module does not sanitize or reset the KRB5_CONFIG environment variable before initializing Kerberos libraries, allowing user-controlled configuration paths

The system is affected if pam-krb5 version 3.12 or earlier is installed AND any setuid application uses this PAM module, allowing untrusted users to control the Kerberos configuration file location via environment variables.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.12
Interim mitigation

Upgrade pam-krb5 to version 3.13 or later which contains proper setuid initialization. Alternatively, audit systems to ensure untrusted users cannot control Kerberos configuration file locations before PAM-based setuid applications execute.

Fix this in Pam Krb5 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,872.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0360 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0360 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data