CVE-2009-0578
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGNOME NetworkManager before 0.7.0.99 does not properly verify privileges for dbus (1) modify and (2) delete requests, which allows local users to change or remove the network connections of arbitrary users via unspecified vectors related to org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings and at_console.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGNOME NetworkManager before version 0.7.0.99 lacks proper privilege validation in its D-Bus interface for the org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings service. The vulnerability allows local users to modify or delete network connection settings belonging to other users by exploiting insufficient access control checks on at_console operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NetworkManager is installedRun 'dpkg -l | grep network-manager' or 'which NetworkManager' to confirm NetworkManager package is present on the systemAffected if NetworkManager is installed and the package version is below 0.7.0.99
-
Check installed NetworkManager versionRun 'network-manager --version' or 'dpkg -s network-manager' to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is earlier than 0.7.0.99 (e.g., 0.7.0, 0.6.x, or earlier)
-
Confirm Ubuntu versionRun 'lsb_release -r' or check '/etc/lsb-release' to verify the Ubuntu releaseAffected if Running Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex)
-
Identify D-Bus service exposureRun 'dbus-send --system --dest=org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings --print-reply /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerSettings.ListConnections' to test if the vulnerable D-Bus interface is accessibleAffected if The D-Bus call returns successfully without proper authorization errors, indicating the org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings service is exposed
A system is affected if it runs Ubuntu 8.10 with NetworkManager version 0.7.0.99 or earlier, and the org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings D-Bus service is accessible without adequate access control restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade NetworkManager to version 0.7.0.99 or later. Additionally, review and restrict D-Bus policy configurations to ensure only authorized users can modify network settings.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0578 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0578 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data