Isa ServerApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2009-1135

HIGH · 9.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-07-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2006 Gold and SP1, when Radius OTP is enabled, uses the HTTP-Basic authentication method, which allows remote attackers to gain the privileges of an arbitrary account, and access published web pages, via vectors involving attempted access to a network resource behind the ISA Server, aka "Radius OTP Bypass Vulnerability."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Microsoft ISA Server 2006 with Radius OTP enabled uses HTTP-Basic authentication, which allows remote attackers to bypass the one-time password mechanism and authenticate as any valid user by sending valid user credentials via HTTP-Basic, granting access to published web resources behind the ISA Server.

MitigationDisable Radius OTP authentication if not required, or implement additional authentication controls layer; apply Microsoft security updates for ISA Server 2006.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Isa ServerApplication
Affected:= 2006

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify ISA Server 2006 is installed
    Check the installed version of Microsoft ISA Server. In ISA Server Management console, go to Help > About, or check the version in Programs and Features. Confirm the version is Microsoft ISA Server 2006.
    Affected if The system is running Microsoft ISA Server 2006.
  2. Identify Radius OTP authentication configuration
    Open ISA Server Management console. Navigate to Authentication > RADIUS OTP. Check if RADIUS OTP authentication is configured and enabled for any authentication scenario.
    Affected if RADIUS OTP authentication is configured or enabled on the ISA Server.
  3. Check web publishing rules using OTP authentication
    In ISA Server Management, navigate to Firewall Policy or Web Publishing Rules. Review each rule and inspect its authentication settings. Look for rules configured to use RADIUS OTP or One-Time Password authentication.
    Affected if Any web publishing rule or firewall rule is configured to use RADIUS OTP authentication.
  4. Verify HTTP-Basic is available as fallback
    In the authentication settings for the identified rules, check if HTTP-Basic authentication is enabled as an authentication method alongside or instead of RADIUS OTP.
    Affected if HTTP-Basic authentication is enabled on rules that also use or could use RADIUS OTP.

A user is affected if they have Microsoft ISA Server 2006 running with RADIUS OTP authentication configured on any web publishing or firewall rule, particularly when HTTP-Basic authentication is also available as an authentication option.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable Radius OTP authentication if not required, or implement additional authentication controls layer; apply Microsoft security updates for ISA Server 2006.

Fix this in Isa Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-1135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-1135 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data