CVE-2009-2497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, and 3.5 SP1, and Silverlight 2, does not properly handle interfaces, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted Silverlight application, (3) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (4) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft Silverlight and Microsoft .NET Framework CLR Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a remote code execution vulnerability in the Common Language Runtime (CLR) of Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0/3.5 and Silverlight 2. The flaw involves improper handling of interfaces, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code by tricking users into running crafted XBAP browser applications, Silverlight apps, ASP.NET applications, or standalone .NET applications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 2.0= 1.1= 3.5= 1.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed .NET Framework versionRun 'reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v2.0.50727" /v Version' or check the registry key for .NET Framework versions under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\Affected if The installed version is .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 1.0, or 1.1 as listed in the affected versions
-
Check for Silverlight 2 installationInspect the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Silverlight or run 'reg query HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Silverlight /v Version'Affected if Silverlight version 2 is installed and vulnerable
-
Verify if .NET Framework browser integration is enabledCheck browser settings or installed browser add-ons for .NET Framework Assistant or XBAP support, or inspect installed components via 'Get-ItemProperty' on registry keys under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Mozilla\Firefox\extensionsAffected if Browsers have .NET Framework add-on support enabled, allowing XBAP or managed browser applications to run
-
Confirm ASP.NET is installed and runningCheck for ASP.NET via 'C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_regiis.exe -lk' or inspect IIS for ASP.NET version entries in the registryAffected if ASP.NET is installed and configured on the system, providing a potential attack vector for the CLR flaw
-
Determine Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'Affected if The system runs Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, Server 2008, or Windows 7 - all listed as affected platforms for this CLR vulnerability
A system is likely affected if it runs any of the vulnerable Windows versions with .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 1.0, or 1.1 installed, or has Silverlight 2, and the system user could potentially run untrusted .NET or Silverlight applications via browser or web server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates MS09-061 (for .NET Framework) and any corresponding Silverlight updates to patch the CLR interface handling flaw, or upgrade affected systems to patched versions of .NET Framework and Silverlight.
Upgrade to a supported Windows version (Windows 8.1 or later) with a supported .NET Framework version (4.5 or later)
- Identify the installed version of Microsoft .NET Framework on the affected system
- Apply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS09-061, which addresses CVE-2009-2497. For .NET Framework 2.0, install KB974417. For other versions, install the corresponding update from MS09-061
- Alternatively, consider upgrading to a supported version of Windows and .NET Framework as these affected products are end-of-life
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data