CVE-2009-3301
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger underflow in filter/ww8/ww8par2.cxx in OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted sprmTDefTable table property modifier in a Word document.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger underflow vulnerability in OpenOffice.org's Word document parser (filter/ww8/ww8par2.cxx) when processing the sprmTDefTable table property modifier. This allows heap corruption via crafted table properties in malicious .doc files, potentially enabling remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.0= 8.04= 8.10= 9.04= 9.10= 4.0= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed OpenOffice versionRun 'rpm -q openoffice.org-core' or 'dpkg -l | grep openoffice' (Debian/Ubuntu) to retrieve the installed package version numberAffected if The version number is lower than 3.2.0 (e.g., 3.1.x, 3.0.x, 2.x series)
-
Confirm package name matches vulnerable productsVerify the installed package is from Apache OpenOffice, Ubuntu, or Debian distributions listed in the affected versionsAffected if The installed package is from the affected vendors and the version is in the vulnerable range
-
Check Word document filter component existsVerify the file filter/ww8/ww8par2.cxx or corresponding binary component is present in the OpenOffice installation directory (typically /usr/lib/openoffice or /opt/openoffice)Affected if The ww8 Word parser component is present and functional
-
Determine if user opens .doc files with OpenOfficeReview whether users in the environment use OpenOffice to open Microsoft Word (.doc) documents, as the vulnerability is triggered during .doc file parsingAffected if Users process .doc files through OpenOffice's Word document parser
The environment is affected if OpenOffice version is below 3.2.0 and users open malicious .doc files using the built-in Word document parser.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.0
Upgrade to OpenOffice.org 3.2 or later to patch the vulnerability; avoid opening untrusted Word documents until patched.
OpenOffice 3.2.0 or later
- Check current OpenOffice version by running 'soffice --version' or through the Help > About menu
- For Ubuntu/Debian systems, run 'sudo apt-get update' then 'sudo apt-get upgrade openoffice.org' or 'sudo apt-get install openoffice.org=1:3.2.0-1'
- Alternatively, download OpenOffice 3.2.0 or later from the official Apache OpenOffice website at https://www.openoffice.org/download/
- For enterprise deployments, obtain the fixed package from your Linux distribution's security repository
- Close any running OpenOffice instances before upgrading
- After upgrade, verify the new version is installed by checking 'soffice --version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-3301 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.openoffice.org
- www.openoffice.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- securitytracker.com
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-3301 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data