CVE-2009-3302
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedfilter/ww8/ww8par2.cxx in OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted sprmTSetBrc table property modifier in a Word document, related to a "boundary error flaw."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA boundary error flaw exists in the Word document filter (ww8par2.cxx) of OpenOffice.org versions before 3.2. The vulnerability is triggered by a specially crafted Word document containing a malformed sprmTSetBrc table property modifier, which can cause memory corruption leading to application crash or potentially arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.0= 8.04= 8.10= 9.04= 9.10= 4.0= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OpenOffice.org is installedCheck for the presence of OpenOffice on the system. On Linux, run 'dpkg -l | grep -i openoffice' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i openoffice' depending on package manager. On Windows, check Program Files for OpenOffice installation directories.Affected if OpenOffice.org is not found on the system, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Determine installed OpenOffice versionRun 'openoffice --version' or 'soffice --version' from command line. Alternatively, check the version through the application's Help > About menu if GUI access is available.Affected if Version is blank, unknown, or reports a version earlier than 3.2.0.
-
Confirm version falls within affected rangeCompare the installed version number against the affected range: Apache OpenOffice versions before 3.2.0 are vulnerable. If your version starts with 3.0, 3.1, or any 3.x version below 3.2.0, you are within the affected range.Affected if Installed version is 3.0.x, 3.1.x, or any version between 1.0 and 3.1.x.
-
Identify Word document processing usageCheck if the system or users routinely open Word documents (.doc, .docx) using OpenOffice Writer. Review file association settings or user workflows that involve opening Word files with OpenOffice.Affected if Users open Word documents using OpenOffice Writer, and the OpenOffice version is vulnerable.
If OpenOffice.org is installed with a version lower than 3.2.0 and users process Word documents with it, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.2.0
Upgrade to OpenOffice.org 3.2 or later to obtain the patched version. Until upgrade is possible, avoid opening Word documents from untrusted sources and ensure antivirus scanning is enabled.
OpenOffice 3.2.0 or later (ideally the latest Apache OpenOffice 4.x series for ongoing security support)
- Check the current OpenOffice version installed (e.g., 'rpm -qa | grep openoffice' or 'dpkg -l | grep openoffice' or via Help > About in the GUI)
- For Debian/Ubuntu systems: Run 'sudo apt-get update' followed by 'sudo apt-get install openoffice.org' to upgrade to the available fixed version
- For RPM-based systems: Download OpenOffice 3.2.0 or later from the official Apache OpenOffice archive (https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/) and install using 'rpm -Uvh' or 'yum install'
- Ensure no OpenOffice processes are running during the upgrade
- After installation, verify the version matches 3.2.0 or higher using the methods in step 1
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-3302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.openoffice.org
- www.openoffice.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- securitytracker.com
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-3302 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data