CVE-2009-4537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unediteddrivers/net/r8169.c in the r8169 driver in the Linux kernel 2.6.32.3 and earlier does not properly check the size of an Ethernet frame that exceeds the MTU, which allows remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (temporary network outage) via a packet with a crafted size, in conjunction with certain packets containing A characters and certain packets containing E characters; or (2) cause a denial of service (system crash) via a packet with a crafted size, in conjunction with certain packets containing '\0' characters, related to the value of the status register and erroneous behavior associated with the RxMaxSize register. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2009-1389.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe r8169 network driver in Linux kernel 2.6.32.3 and earlier fails to properly validate Ethernet frame sizes that exceed the configured MTU. This improper boundary check allows remote attackers to send specially crafted packets that either cause a temporary network outage (when combined with packets containing 'A' and 'E' characters) or trigger a kernel panic/system crash (when combined with packets containing null bytes), due to erroneous handling of the RxMaxSize register and status register conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.6.32.3= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun `uname -r` to obtain the running kernel version and compare it to 2.6.32.3 (versions 2.6.32.3 and earlier are affected)Affected if The kernel version is 2.6.32.3 or earlier
-
Identify network interface driverRun `ethtool -i eth0` (replace eth0 with the relevant interface) or `lspci -v | grep -A5 Ethernet` to determine which driver handles the network interfaceAffected if The network interface uses the r8169 driver
-
Verify r8169 driver is loadedRun `lsmod | grep r8169` to check if the r8169 kernel module is currently loadedAffected if The r8169 module is loaded
-
Check Debian version (if applicable)Run `cat /etc/debian_version` to identify the Debian release; Debian 5.0 (Lenny) is listed as affectedAffected if The system is running Debian 5.0 with a vulnerable kernel
A system is affected if it runs Linux kernel 2.6.32.3 or earlier with the r8169 network driver loaded and handling a network interface
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the correct vendor-supplied kernel patch that properly validates incoming frame sizes against MTU and RxMaxSize limits, or upgrade to a kernel version where this issue has been correctly resolved (post-CVE-2009-1389 regression fix).
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-4537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- blog.c22.cc
- events.ccc.de
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- marc.info
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- securitytracker.com
- twitter.com
- www.debian.org
- www.novell.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-4537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data