JreApplication · Sun

CVE-2010-0085

MEDIUM · 5.1 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-04-01
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.6.0 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0088.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment affecting Java SE/Business versions 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27. Allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown attack vectors. Different vulnerability from CVE-2010-0088.

MitigationUpgrade to later Java versions beyond those listed (Java 6u18+, 5.0u23+, 1.4.2_25+, 1.3.1_27+) or apply Oracle critical patch updates. Given the full CIA impact and remote attack vector, prioritize patching for any systems exposed to untrusted input.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JreApplication
Affected:<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.4.2_25= 1.4.2= 1.4.2_1= 1.4.2_2= 1.4.2_3= 1.4.2_4= 1.4.2_5= 1.4.2_6
JdkApplication
Affected:<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.3.1_27= 1.3.0= 1.3.0_01= 1.3.0_02= 1.3.0_03= 1.3.0_04= 1.3.0_05= 1.3.1
SdkApplication
Affected:<= 1.4.2_25= 1.4.2= 1.4.2_1= 1.4.2_02= 1.4.2_3= 1.4.2_4= 1.4.2_5= 1.4.2_6= 1.4.2_7= 1.4.2_8= 1.4.2_9= 1.4.2_10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Java version
    Run 'java -version' from command line or check JAVA_HOME environment variable for the installation path, then inspect the version file in that directory
    Affected if The reported version matches any of these patterns: 1.6.0.x (where x is any update up to 18), 1.5.0.x (up to update 23), 1.4.2_x (where x is 25 or lower), or 1.3.1_x (where x is 27 or lower)
  2. Determine Java product type
    Check if the installation is JRE, JDK, or SDK by examining the installation directory structure or running 'which java' and 'java -version' output
    Affected if The product is Sun JRE, Sun JDK, or Sun SDK versions listed in the affected versions field
  3. Confirm Java is actively used or exposed
    Identify if Java applications are running or if the Java plugin is enabled in browsers, as the vulnerability affects the runtime environment
    Affected if Java is running as a service, used by web applications, or the Java browser plugin is enabled and the version is within the affected range

A system is affected if it runs any Sun JRE, JDK, or SDK version at or below 1.6.0u18, 1.5.0u23, 1.4.2_25, or 1.3.1_27, with remote attack vectors impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.6.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to later Java versions beyond those listed (Java 6u18+, 5.0u23+, 1.4.2_25+, 1.3.1_27+) or apply Oracle critical patch updates. Given the full CIA impact and remote attack vector, prioritize patching for any systems exposed to untrusted input.

Fix this in Jre Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0085 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0085 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data