Unified MeetingplaceApplication · Cisco

CVE-2010-0139

HIGH · 9.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-01-28
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
99/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 7 before 7.0(2.3) hotfix 5F, 6 before 6.0.639.2, and possibly 5 does not properly validate SQL commands, which allows remote attackers to create, modify, or delete data in a database via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCtc39691.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-89

User input is woven into a database query, letting an attacker rewrite the query's logic. From there they can read, alter, or destroy data — frequently the entire database. The reliable fix is parameterised queries (prepared statements), so input is always treated as data and never as SQL.

General guidance for the sql injection class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified MeetingplaceApplication
Affected:= 5= 5.0= 6.0= 6.0.170.0= 6.0.244= 7.0= 7.0.1= 7.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:C

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch www.cisco.com →
Recommended fix High confidence

Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 7.0(2.3) with hotfix 5F (or later) for v7; 6.0.639.2 (or later) for v6; upgrade to supported v6 or v7 for v5

  1. Identify the currently installed Cisco Unified MeetingPlace version using the system administration interface or CLI
  2. For version 7.x users: Upgrade to version 7.0(2.3) with hotfix 5F applied, or a later stable release
  3. For version 6.x users: Upgrade to version 6.0.639.2 or later
  4. For version 5.x users: Consider upgrading to a supported version (6.x or 7.x) as version 5 may no longer be supported
  5. After upgrade, verify the SQL injection vulnerability is resolved by reviewing system logs and confirming database access controls are functioning properly
Caveat Review Cisco release notes for migration path between major versions as there may be configuration or integration changes; version 5 may require migration to newer version rather than in-place upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can apply and verify the patch for your build — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the patch applied

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0139 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data