CVE-2012-5416
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing before 7.1MR1 Patch 1, 8.0 before 8.0MR1 Patch 1, and 8.5 before 8.5MR3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon hang) via unspecified parameters in a POST request, aka Bug ID CSCua66341.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing software that allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending specially crafted parameters in POST requests. The vulnerability affects multiple version branches (7.x, 8.0, and 8.5) prior to their respective patch releases, causing the conferencing daemon to hang.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.1= 7.0= 7.0.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.3= 7.1= 8.0= 8.5= 8.5.1= 8.5.2= 8.5.3= 8.5.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco Unified MeetingPlace is installedCheck for the MeetingPlace installation directory (commonly at C:\Program Files\Cisco Systems\MeetingPlace or /opt/cisco/meetingplace on Linux). Look for the 'mpconf' or 'meetingplace' service running on the system.Affected if The software is not found on the system, meaning the system is not affected by this CVE.
-
Identify the installed versionLocate the version information in the installation directory. On Windows, check the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cisco Systems, Inc.\MeetingPlace\Version or examine the 'about' page of the web conferencing interface by accessing the MeetingPlace URL.Affected if The version matches one of the following: 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.1, any version 7.1 or lower, 8.0, 8.5, 8.5.1, 8.5.2, 8.5.3, or 8.5.4.
-
Confirm the web conferencing service is runningVerify that the 'Cisco Unified MeetingPlace' web service is active and listening on ports 80 or 443. Check via netstat or by attempting to access the MeetingPlace login page.Affected if The web service is running and accessible, making the vulnerability exploitable via crafted POST requests.
-
Check network exposure of the web interfaceReview firewall rules or network configuration to determine if the MeetingPlace web interface (port 80/443) is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if The web interface is accessible from untrusted networks, increasing the risk of remote exploitation.
A system is affected if Cisco Unified MeetingPlace version 7.0 through 7.1 (inclusive), 8.0, or 8.5 through 8.5.4 is installed with the web conferencing interface accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied patches: 7.1MR1 Patch 1, 8.0MR1 Patch 1, or 8.5MR3 as appropriate for the deployed version. If patching is not immediately possible, consider restricting access to the web conferencing interface via network segmentation or firewall rules.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5416 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5416 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data