Proventia Network Mail Security System Virtual ApplianceApplication · Ibm

CVE-2010-0153

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-09-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Local Management Interface (LMI) on the IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System (PNMSS) appliance with firmware before 2.5.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change settings or (2) conduct denial of service attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CSRF vulnerability in the Local Management Interface (LMI) of IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System allows remote attackers to hijack authenticated administrator sessions to modify appliance settings or trigger denial of service conditions. The vulnerability exists in firmware versions prior to 2.5.0.2.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System firmware to version 2.5.0.2 or later, which includes CSRF protection mechanisms. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens for LMI administrative functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Proventia Network Mail Security System Virtual ApplianceApplication
Affected:all versions
Proventia Network Mail Security System Virtual Appliance FirmwareApplication
Affected:= 1.6= 2.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System is deployed
    Identify the appliance or virtual machine running IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System in your environment. Check system inventory or network scans for the product signature.
    Affected if The product IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System Virtual Appliance is present in the environment.
  2. Determine the installed firmware version
    Access the Local Management Interface (LMI) or check the appliance console for the firmware version. The LMI is typically accessed via https on the management IP. Navigate to the system status or about section to view the firmware build number.
    Affected if The firmware version is displayed as a version prior to 2.5.0.2 (for example, 1.6 or 2.5).
  3. Verify the LMI is network-accessible
    Confirm the LMI web interface is reachable on the management network. Attempt to access the login page via HTTP/HTTPS to determine if the administrative interface is exposed.
    Affected if The LMI web interface responds to HTTP/HTTPS requests and accepts administrator authentication.
  4. Check for CSRF protection mechanisms
    Inspect the LMI administrative pages for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens or unique request identifiers in forms and AJAX requests. View the page source of LMI administrative forms to look for hidden token fields or request validation.
    Affected if No anti-CSRF tokens or request validation tokens are found in LMI administrative forms, indicating the CSRF protection is absent.

If the IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System Virtual Appliance is running firmware versions prior to 2.5.0.2 and the LMI is accessible, the environment is affected by this CSRF vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System firmware to version 2.5.0.2 or later, which includes CSRF protection mechanisms. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens for LMI administrative functions.

Fix this in Proventia Network Mail Security System Virtual Appliance Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0153 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0153 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data