CVE-2010-0844
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Sound component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is for improper parsing of a crafted MIDI stream when creating a MixerSequencer object, which causes a pointer to be corrupted and allows a NULL byte to be written to arbitrary memory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability in Java's Sound component allows arbitrary memory writes via improper parsing of crafted MIDI streams when creating a MixerSequencer object. The flaw causes pointer corruption, enabling a NULL byte to be written to arbitrary memory locations, leading to potential code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.4.2_25= 1.4.2= 1.4.2_1= 1.4.2_2= 1.4.2_3= 1.4.2_4= 1.4.2_5= 1.4.2_6<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.3.1_27= 1.3.0= 1.3.0_01= 1.3.0_02= 1.3.0_03= 1.3.0_04= 1.3.0_05= 1.3.1<= 1.4.2_25= 1.4.2= 1.4.2_1= 1.4.2_02= 1.4.2_3= 1.4.2_4= 1.4.2_5= 1.4.2_6= 1.4.2_7= 1.4.2_8= 1.4.2_9= 1.4.2_10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'javac -version' from command line to get the JRE/JDK version numberAffected if Version matches any of the affected ranges: JRE/JDK 1.6.0 and below, 1.5.0 and below, 1.4.2_25 and below, 1.3.1_27 and below, or specific point releases like 1.4.2_1 through 1.4.2_10, 1.3.0 through 1.3.0_05
-
Determine if Java applets or web Start are enabledCheck browser Java plugin settings or Java Control Panel (Java > Security) for 'Enable Java content in browser' settingAffected if Java browser plugin is enabled and untrusted MIDI content can be loaded
-
Identify MIDI processing usageSearch application code or loaded classes for MixerSequencer usage (javax.sound.midi.MixerSequencer) or MIDI file handlingAffected if Code creates MixerSequencer objects or processes MIDI streams from untrusted sources
User is affected if they run any Sun JRE/JDK/SDK version within the 1.3.x to 1.6.0 family listed as vulnerable and have Java applets enabled or process untrusted MIDI content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Java SE critical patch updates to versions beyond the affected releases (6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, 1.3.1_27). Alternatively, disable Java plugin in browsers and restrict MIDI file processing in untrusted contexts until patching is feasible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0844 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- lists.apple.com
- lists.apple.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- itrc.hp.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- marc.info
- www.oracle.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0844 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data