CVE-2010-0846
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the ImageIO component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the March 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a heap-based buffer overflow that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, related to an "invalid assignment" and inconsistent length values in a JPEG image encoder (JPEGImageEncoderImpl).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Java's ImageIO JPEGImageEncoderImpl component. The flaw involves invalid assignment and inconsistent length values during JPEG encoding, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted JPEG images.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.4.2_25= 1.4.2= 1.4.2_1= 1.4.2_2= 1.4.2_3= 1.4.2_4= 1.4.2_5= 1.4.2_6<= 1.6.0= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0= 1.5.0<= 1.3.1_27= 1.3.0= 1.3.0_01= 1.3.0_02= 1.3.0_03= 1.3.0_04= 1.3.0_05= 1.3.1<= 1.4.2_25= 1.4.2= 1.4.2_1= 1.4.2_02= 1.4.2_3= 1.4.2_4= 1.4.2_5= 1.4.2_6= 1.4.2_7= 1.4.2_8= 1.4.2_9= 1.4.2_10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line. On Windows, also check registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Runtime Environment for the CurrentVersion value, then check the corresponding Version key.Affected if The reported version matches any of the affected ranges: JRE/JDK 1.6.0 and below, 1.5.0 and below, 1.4.2_25 and below, or specific versions 1.3.1_27 and below, 1.3.0_x, 1.4.2_x (where x is 1-10)
-
Determine Java vendor and full update versionCheck the full version string including update number (for example, 1.6.0_18). Look in the Java installation directory for release files or use 'java -verbose' to get detailed version info.Affected if The full version string falls within or below the patched releases: 1.6.0_18, 5.0u23, 1.4.2_25, or 1.3.1_27
-
Confirm ImageIO JPEG processing is availableVerify the Java ImageIO library is present. Check for jre/lib/rt.jar containing javax.imageio classes, or test by running code that imports javax.imageio.ImageIO.Affected if ImageIO is a built-in module in affected Java versions and is present by default - the vulnerability applies whenever JPEG encoding occurs using this component
You are affected if you are running any Sun/Oracle Java version 1.6.0_18 or earlier, 5.0u23 or earlier, 1.4.2_25 or earlier, or 1.3.1_27 or earlier that has ImageIO available for processing JPEG images.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched Java version beyond the affected releases (6u18, 5.0u23, 1.4.2_25, 1.3.1_27). For legacy systems unable to upgrade, consider disabling ImageIO processing or implementing input validation for JPEG files.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0846 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- itrc.hp.com
- lists.apple.com
- lists.apple.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- marc.info
- marc.info
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0846 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data