CVE-2010-2029
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCybozu Office 7 Ktai and Dotsales do not properly restrict access to the login page, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain or modify sensitive information by using the unique ID of the user's cell phone.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCybozu Office 7 Ktai (mobile) and Dotsales fail to properly restrict access to the login page, allowing remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging the unique identifier of a user's cell phone. This enables unauthorized access to sensitive information or data modification without valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cybozu Office 7 installationLocate the Cybozu Office installation directory or check system inventory for Cybozu Office version 7Affected if Cybozu Office version 7 is installed and the mobile (Ktai) feature is enabled
-
Identify Cybozu Dotsales installationLocate the Cybozu Dotsales installation or check system inventoryAffected if Cybozu Dotsales of any version is installed
-
Verify mobile access is enabledCheck Cybozu Office 7 configuration settings for Ktai/mobile access functionalityAffected if Mobile (Ktai) access module is enabled in Cybozu Office 7
-
Test authentication bypass via cell phone unique IDAttempt to access the login page using only a cell phone unique identifier (such as the phone number or device ID) as the authentication credentialAffected if Authentication succeeds using only the cell phone unique identifier without additional credentials
-
Review authentication configurationExamine the login page authentication settings in the Cybozu system to determine if device identification alone is sufficient for accessAffected if The system accepts cell phone unique ID as sole authentication factor
Environment is affected if Cybozu Office 7 with mobile/Ktai enabled or any version of Cybozu Dotsales is running and the login page accepts cell phone unique identifiers as sole authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and session validation on the login page, ensuring the cell phone unique ID alone cannot bypass authentication controls. Require additional credential verification even for known device identifiers.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-2029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-2029 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data