Cybozu OfficeApplication · Cybozu

CVE-2013-3269

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-04-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8 or later.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change mobile passwords, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2305.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by tricking them into submitting malicious requests that change mobile passwords. The vulnerability affects versions before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0.

MitigationApply vendor patches (Cybozu Office 8.1.6 or 9.3.0 and later) to implement anti-CSRF token validation for mobile password change operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cybozu OfficeApplication
Affected:<= 8= 6= 7= 9= 9.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Cybozu Office is installed
    Locate Cybozu Office by checking for its installation directory (typically under C:\Program Files\Cybozu or /opt/cybozu on Linux) or by accessing the web interface on common ports (80/443). Confirm the product name in the application header or title.
    Affected if Cybozu Office is not found on the system
  2. Identify the installed version
    Access the system settings or administration panel in Cybozu Office. The version information is typically found under 'System Settings' > 'System Information' or by accessing the /cgi-bin/cbgrn/cbgrn.exe?g=adm_menu URL pattern. Alternatively, check the about page or version.txt in the installation directory.
    Affected if The version is 6.x, 7.x, 8.x before 8.1.6, or 9.x before 9.3.0 (including 9.2.1)
  3. Confirm mobile interface is enabled
    Check if mobile access is available by attempting to access the mobile interface URL (typically /mobile/ or /sp/ path) or by reviewing the system settings for mobile device access under 'System Settings' > 'Mobile Settings'.
    Affected if Mobile interface is accessible and enabled for users
  4. Verify CSRF protection on password change
    Attempt to access the mobile password change function without a CSRF token. Submit a password change request via the mobile interface and inspect whether the application validates an anti-CSRF token (such as a session-bound token or referer check). Check the HTML source for a hidden token field in password change forms.
    Affected if No anti-CSRF token is present in the mobile password change form or the request is processed without token validation

A user is affected if Cybozu Office version is 6.x, 7.x, 8.x before 8.1.6, or 9.x before 9.3.0, and the mobile interface with password change functionality is enabled and lacks CSRF protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patches (Cybozu Office 8.1.6 or 9.3.0 and later) to implement anti-CSRF token validation for mobile password change operations.

Fix this in Cybozu Office Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-3269 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-3269 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data