CVE-2010-2521
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple buffer overflows in fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c in the XDR implementation in the NFS server in the Linux kernel before 2.6.34-rc6 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (panic) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted NFSv4 compound WRITE request, related to the read_buf and nfsd4_decode_compound functions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the Linux kernel's NFSv4 server XDR implementation (fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c). The read_buf and nfsd4_decode_compound functions fail to properly bounds-check when processing NFSv4 compound WRITE requests, allowing remote attackers to trigger a kernel panic or potentially achieve arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.6.34= 2.6.0= 2.6.1= 2.6.2= 2.6.3= 2.6.4= 2.6.5= 2.6.6= 2.6.7= 2.6.8= 2.6.8.1= 2.6.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to obtain the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version is 2.6.34 or earlier (2.6.0 through 2.6.9, or any version <= 2.6.34)
-
Verify NFS kernel module is loadedRun `lsmod | grep nfsd` to check if the nfsd kernel module is loadedAffected if The nfsd module is loaded, indicating NFS server functionality is present
-
Check if NFS server service is runningRun `service nfs status` or `systemctl status nfs-server` (or check for rpc.nfsd processes with `ps aux | grep nfsd`)Affected if The NFS server daemon is actively running
-
Identify NFS exports configuredExamine `/etc/exports` and run `exportfs -v` to list NFS export pathsAffected if NFS exports are defined, meaning the server is configured to serve filesystems
-
Confirm NFSv4 protocol in useCheck `/etc/exports` for 'fsid=0' or 'v4' options, or inspect `/proc/fs/nfsd/versions` for NFSv4 supportAffected if NFSv4 protocol support is enabled (the vulnerability specifically affects NFSv4 compound request processing)
A system is affected if it runs a kernel version <= 2.6.34 and has the NFSv4 server (nfsd) module loaded and configured to serve NFSv4 exports.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Linux kernel to version 2.6.34-rc6 or later, which contains the bounds-checking fix for the vulnerable XDR functions.
Linux Kernel 2.6.34-rc6 or later stable release (e.g., 2.6.34 stable)
- Identify the current kernel version using 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version'
- Backup critical data and configuration files before proceeding
- Check package manager availability (yum, apt, dnf, zypper depending on distribution)
- Update package lists: 'yum check-update' (RHEL/CentOS) or 'apt-get update' (Debian/Ubuntu)
- Install the new kernel package: 'yum install kernel-2.6.34' or 'apt-get install linux-image-2.6.34'
- Update bootloader configuration (GRUB) to ensure the new kernel is bootable
- Reboot the system to load the new kernel: 'reboot'
- After reboot, verify the new kernel is running: 'uname -r'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-2521 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- git.kernel.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- securitytracker.com
- www.debian.org
- www.kernel.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-2521 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data