CVE-2010-3904
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe rds_page_copy_user function in net/rds/page.c in the Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol implementation in the Linux kernel before 2.6.36 does not properly validate addresses obtained from user space, which allows local users to gain privileges via crafted use of the sendmsg and recvmsg system calls.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKernel privilege escalation vulnerability in the RDS (Reliable Datagram Sockets) protocol implementation. The rds_page_copy_user function in net/rds/page.c fails to properly validate user-space addresses before using them in kernel context, allowing local attackers to manipulate kernel memory through crafted sendmsg/recvmsg system calls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.6.36= 6.06= 8.04= 9.04= 9.10= 10.04= 10.10= 5.0= 6.0= 3.5= 4.0= 4.1= 5.0= 11.2= 11.3= 11= 11= 11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if the RDS kernel module is loadedRun `lsmod | grep rds` or check `/proc/modules` for the rds moduleAffected if The rds module is loaded or loadable on the system
-
Verify the running kernel versionRun `uname -r` and compare the version number to 2.6.36Affected if The kernel version is earlier than 2.6.36 (e.g., 2.6.35.x, 2.6.34.x, etc.)
-
Confirm RDS protocol support is enabled in the kernelCheck for the presence of rds-related files in /proc/net/ (e.g., `ls /proc/net/rds` or `cat /proc/net/rds`)Affected if The RDS protocol is registered and visible in /proc/net/rds
-
Determine if the system can create RDS socketsAttempt to create an RDS socket using tools like `ss -a` with rds family, or check kernel config for CONFIG_RDS kernel configuration optionAffected if RDS sockets can be created or the CONFIG_RDS kernel option is set to y/m
The system is affected if the RDS kernel module is loaded AND the kernel version is earlier than 2.6.36, allowing local privilege escalation via the rds_page_copy_user vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.6.36
Apply the upstream kernel patch or upgrade to Linux kernel 2.6.36 or later. If RDS is not required, disable the rds kernel module as a temporary workaround.
Linux Kernel 2.6.36 or later, or distribution-specific kernel updates that include this fix
- 1. Check the current running kernel version using 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version'
- 2. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS systems, run 'yum update kernel' to install the latest kernel version
- 3. For Debian/Ubuntu systems, run 'apt-get update && apt-get install linux-image-<version>' to install the updated kernel
- 4. For SUSE systems, run 'zypper update kernel-default'
- 5. After installation, update GRUB bootloader configuration if necessary using 'update-grub' or 'grub2-mkconfig'
- 6. Reboot the system to load the fixed kernel: 'reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new kernel version is running using 'uname -r' and confirm it is version 2.6.36 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3904 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- bugzilla.redhat.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- packetstormsecurity.com
- secunia.com
- securitytracker.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vmware.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- git.kernel.org
- www.kernel.org
- www.vsecurity.com
- www.vsecurity.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3904 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data