CVE-2010-4601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.0.x before 7.0.1.11, 7.1.1.x before 7.1.1.4, and 7.1.2.x before 7.1.2.1 allow attackers to have an unknown impact via vectors related to third-party .ocx files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Rational ClearQuest allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or have other unknown impacts via third-party .OCX (ActiveX) files. The CVSS score of 10 indicates critical severity, likely involving remote code execution or complete system compromise through malicious ActiveX controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.0.0.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.0.2= 7.0.0.3= 7.0.0.4= 7.0.0.5= 7.0.0.6= 7.0.0.7= 7.0.0.8= 7.0.0.9= 7.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM Rational ClearQuest is installedCheck for ClearQuest installation by looking in the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Rational Software or HKLM\SOFTWARE\IBM\Rational, or look for the ClearQuest executable (cq.exe) in typical installation paths like C:\Program Files\IBM\Rational\ClearQuest or C:\Rational\ClearQuestAffected if ClearQuest is found installed on the system
-
Identify the installed ClearQuest versionOpen ClearQuest and navigate to Help > About, or check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Rational Software\ClearQuest\CurrentVersion for the Version value, or examine the version property of the cq.exe binaryAffected if The installed version is 7.0, 7.0.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.0.2, 7.0.0.3, 7.0.0.4, 7.0.0.5, 7.0.0.6, 7.0.0.7, 7.0.0.8, 7.0.0.9, or 7.0.1 (any version from 7.0 through 7.0.1 inclusive)
-
Determine if third-party ActiveX controls can be loadedCheck if the ClearQuest client has the ability to load or register third-party .OCX files, or examine browser/ActiveX settings in the Windows system where ClearQuest is used. Look for permissions that allow loading of untrusted ActiveX controls in Internet Explorer settings or ClearQuest configurationAffected if The system allows loading of untrusted third-party ActiveX controls and ClearQuest version is within the affected range
You are affected if IBM Rational ClearQuest version 7.0 through 7.0.1 is installed and the system permits loading of third-party ActiveX controls (.OCX files).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Rational ClearQuest to version 7.0.1.11, 7.1.1.4, or 7.1.2.1 or later. As a compensating control, restrict or disable loading of untrusted third-party ActiveX controls and implement application whitelisting.
IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.0.1.11 or later in the 7.0.1.x release line
- 1. Verify current IBM Rational ClearQuest installation version by checking About in the application or using the Version command-line utility.
- 2. Download IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.0.1.11 or later from IBM Fix Central (https://www-01.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/) or your IBM Passport Advantage account.
- 3. Ensure all users are logged out of ClearQuest and back up the ClearQuest database and configuration files.
- 4. Stop all ClearQuest services including the ClearQuest Web and ClearQuest Rational Directory Server services.
- 5. Run the ClearQuest installer and follow the IBM installation wizard to upgrade to version 7.0.1.11 or later.
- 6. After installation, verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in About ClearQuest.
- 7. Restart all ClearQuest services and confirm users can connect and authenticate successfully.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-4601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-4601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data