Rational ClearquestApplication · Ibm

CVE-2011-1390

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-05-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in the Maintenance tool in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.1.x before 7.1.1.9, 7.1.2.x before 7.1.2.6, and 8.x before 8.0.0.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands by leveraging an error in the user-database upgrade feature.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Rational ClearQuest's Maintenance tool user-database upgrade feature allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands by injecting malicious SQL payloads.

MitigationApply vendor patches (7.1.1.9, 7.1.2.6, or 8.0.0.2) to the affected ClearQuest installations. Additionally, restrict network access to the Maintenance tool interface to prevent external exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rational ClearquestApplication
Affected:= 7.1.1.1= 7.1.1.2= 7.1.1.3= 7.1.1.4= 7.1.1.5= 7.1.1.6= 7.1.1.7= 7.1.1.8= 7.1.2= 7.1.2.1= 7.1.2.2= 7.1.2.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed ClearQuest version
    Locate the ClearQuest installation and check its version. On Windows, this is often available in Add/Remove Programs or the installation directory's version info. In Unix/Linux, check the installation path's version file or run 'cq lsversion' if available.
    Affected if The installed version matches any of: 7.1.1.1, 7.1.1.2, 7.1.1.3, 7.1.1.4, 7.1.1.5, 7.1.1.6, 7.1.1.7, 7.1.1.8, 7.1.2, 7.1.2.1, 7.1.2.2, or 7.1.2.3
  2. Determine if Maintenance tool web interface is exposed
    Identify the host running ClearQuest and check if the Maintenance tool HTTP port is reachable from the network. The Maintenance tool typically runs as a web service; scan common ClearQuest maintenance ports or check server configuration for exposed web interfaces.
    Affected if The Maintenance tool web interface is accessible from network locations, especially untrusted networks.
  3. Verify the upgrade feature is accessible
    Attempt to access the Maintenance tool's user-database upgrade endpoint, typically found at a URL path related to 'upgrade' or 'maintenance'. This is often a web form or API endpoint used for database schema updates.
    Affected if The user-database upgrade feature of the Maintenance tool is exposed and accessible without authentication.
  4. Check network access controls
    Review firewall rules, network segmentation, or access control lists that govern who can reach the Maintenance tool interface. Determine if the service is bound to localhost only, internal networks, or is openly accessible.
    Affected if The Maintenance tool interface can be reached by unauthenticated or untrusted network actors.

You are affected if you are running any of the listed versions AND the Maintenance tool user-database upgrade feature is network-accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches (7.1.1.9, 7.1.2.6, or 8.0.0.2) to the affected ClearQuest installations. Additionally, restrict network access to the Maintenance tool interface to prevent external exploitation.

Fix this in Rational Clearquest Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1390 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1390 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data