CVE-2011-0396
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Adaptive Security Appliances (ASA) 5500 series devices with software 8.0 before 8.0(5.23), 8.1 before 8.1(2.49), 8.2 before 8.2(4.1), and 8.3 before 8.3(2.13), when a Certificate Authority (CA) is configured, allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCtk12352.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco ASA 5500 series devices running software versions 8.0 before 8.0(5.23), 8.1 before 8.1(2.49), 8.2 before 8.2(4.1), or 8.3 before 8.3(2.13) contain a path traversal vulnerability when a Certificate Authority (CA) is configured. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files on the device via unspecified vectors, potentially exposing sensitive configuration data, credentials, or certificates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0\(2\)= 8.0\(3\)= 8.0\(4\)= 8.0\(5\)= 8.1\(1\)= 8.1\(2\)= 8.2= 8.2\(1\)= 8.2\(2\)= 8.3= 8.0= 8.3\(1\)all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine ASA software versionConnect to the ASA CLI and run the command: `show version` Look for the version number in the output (for example: 8.0(4), 8.2(1), 8.3, etc.)Affected if The version shown is 8.0(x) before 8.0(5.23), 8.1(x) before 8.1(2.49), 8.2(x) before 8.2(4.1), or 8.3(x) before 8.3(2.13)
-
Verify if CA is configuredRun the command: `show run | include crypto ca` or `show run crypto ca` to check for any Certificate Authority configuration entriesAffected if Any CA (crypto ca) configuration exists on the device
-
Check for specific CA-related commandsRun: `show run crypto ca trustpoint` and `show run crypto ca certificate` to see if trustpoints or certificates are configuredAffected if Any trustpoint or certificate configuration is present
-
Confirm management access exposureRun: `show run | include management-access` or `show run interface` to see how the device is accessible and from which networksAffected if The ASA management interface is accessible from untrusted networks (such as the internet or DMZ)
You are affected if your ASA runs a version in the 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, or 8.3 branches that is older than the patched versions AND you have CA (Certificate Authority) functionality configured on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco ASA software to version 8.0(5.23), 8.1(2.49), 8.2(4.1), 8.3(2.13) or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict management access to the ASA via ACLs and consider disabling CA features if not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-0396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-0396 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data