CVE-2011-1064
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in member/list.php in qibosoft Qi Bo CMS 7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the aidDB[] parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in member/list.php of Qi Bo CMS 7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the unsanitized aidDB[] parameter. This enables attackers to manipulate database queries, potentially exposing sensitive data, modifying database contents, or compromising the underlying system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Qi Bo CMS installationSearch the web root directory for CMS-specific files such as index.php, config.php, or common Qi Bo CMS signature files. Check for directories named 'cms', 'qibo', or similar.Affected if The system has Qi Bo CMS files present in the web directory.
-
Identify installed CMS versionLocate the version file or header within the CMS installation, typically found in an about.php, version.php, or in the source code comments of core files. Compare the version number to the affected version 7.Affected if The installed version is exactly version 7.
-
Verify vulnerable script existsCheck for the presence of member/list.php in the web root. This is the file containing the SQL injection flaw.Affected if The file member/list.php exists and is accessible via the web server.
-
Check parameter handling in the vulnerable fileReview the source code of member/list.php for the aidDB[] parameter usage. Look for unsanitized database queries that incorporate this parameter directly into SQL statements.Affected if The code shows the aidDB[] parameter being used in SQL queries without input validation or parameterized queries.
-
Assess external exposureDetermine if the member/list.php endpoint is accessible from external networks. Check web server access logs for requests to this endpoint.Affected if The vulnerable script is accessible externally and has received requests containing the aidDB[] parameter.
The environment is affected if Qi Bo CMS version 7 is installed, the member/list.php file exists, and the aidDB[] parameter is handled without sanitization in SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters, specifically the aidDB[] parameter. Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements. If a vendor patch is available, apply it immediately.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1064 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data