Openview Storage Data ProtectorApplication · Hp

CVE-2011-1731

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-05-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Stack-based buffer overflow in OmniInet.exe in the Backup Client Service in HP OpenView Storage Data Protector 6.00, 6.10, and 6.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed EXEC_INTEGUTIL message.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in OmniInet.exe in HP OpenView Storage Data Protector allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed EXEC_INTEGUTIL message. The vulnerability exists in the Backup Client Service across versions 6.00, 6.10, and 6.11.

MitigationApply vendor patches from HP for Data Protector or upgrade to a patched version. If patches are unavailable, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the Backup Client Service to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openview Storage Data ProtectorApplication
Affected:= 6.00= 6.10= 6.11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if HP OpenView Storage Data Protector is installed
    Look for the Data Protector installation directory, typically under C:\Program Files\HP\Data Protector or C:\hp\Data Protector. On Unix/Linux systems, check /opt/hp/dataprotector or /usr/local/hp/dataprotector.
    Affected if The software is not found, meaning the product is not installed and the system is not affected.
  2. Identify the installed Data Protector version
    Check the version of omniinet.exe or look for version information in the installation directory. The executable is typically located in the \bin\ folder of the Data Protector installation. Run 'omniinet.exe -version' or check file properties of the OmniInet.exe binary.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.00, 6.10, or 6.11, matching the affected versions listed.
  3. Verify the Backup Client Service (OmniInet.exe) is running
    On Windows, open Services console and look for 'HP OpenView Storage Data Protector' or 'OmniInet' service. On Unix/Linux, run 'ps -ef | grep omniinet' to check if the process is active.
    Affected if The OmniInet.exe service is running, making the vulnerable component active on the system.
  4. Determine if the Backup Client Service is network accessible
    Check if the OmniInet service is listening on network ports (default ports are 5555 for OmniInet). Run 'netstat -an | grep 5555' or use a port scanner to test connectivity to the service from untrusted networks.
    Affected if The service is exposed to network access, particularly to untrusted networks, increasing the risk of remote exploitation.

A system is affected if HP OpenView Storage Data Protector versions 6.00, 6.10, or 6.11 are installed with the OmniInet.exe Backup Client Service running and network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches from HP for Data Protector or upgrade to a patched version. If patches are unavailable, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the Backup Client Service to untrusted networks.

Fix this in Openview Storage Data Protector Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-1731 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-1731 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data