CVE-2011-2054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco ASA that could allow a remote attacker to successfully authenticate using the Cisco AnyConnect VPN client if the Secondary Authentication type is LDAP and the password is left blank, providing the primary credentials are correct. The vulnerabilities is due to improper input validation of certain parameters passed to the affected software. An attacker must have the correct primary credentials in order to successfully exploit this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco ASA contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the AnyConnect VPN client authentication path. When LDAP is used for Secondary Authentication and the password field is left blank (while primary credentials are valid), the system incorrectly authenticates the attacker. This bypasses the intended secondary authentication checkpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)= 8.4\(1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco ASA firmware versionRun the command 'show version' on the ASA CLI or check via ASDM to retrieve the installed firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is exactly 8.4(1) on any of the affected models (ASA 5500, 5510, 5512-X, 5515-X, 5520, 5525-X, 5540, 5545-X).
-
Verify AnyConnect VPN is enabledCheck the ASA configuration for AnyConnect using 'show run webvpn' or via ASDM under Remote Access VPN > AnyConnect Client Profile.Affected if AnyConnect VPN is active and configured on the device.
-
Confirm LDAP is configured for secondary authenticationRun 'show run aaa-server' to list AAA server configurations, then examine the authentication and authorization policies for secondary authentication using 'show run' commands related to AAA or via ASDM under Remote Access VPN > AAA Setup.Affected if LDAP is configured as an authentication server for secondary (or second) authentication in the AnyConnect connection profile.
-
Inspect secondary authentication configuration for blank password handlingReview the AAA authentication and authorization settings for the AnyConnect connection profile. Look for 'authentication-server-group' and 'authorization-server-group' commands, specifically examining whether secondary authentication is configured with LDAP and how it handles password validation.Affected if LDAP-based secondary authentication is configured and the system may accept blank passwords for the secondary authentication attempt.
The environment is affected if the Cisco ASA runs firmware 8.4(1), has AnyConnect VPN enabled, and uses LDAP for secondary authentication, allowing the blank password bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Cisco ASA software update or patch that addresses input validation for LDAP secondary authentication parameters. Alternatively, enforce password requirements in LDAP to reject blank passwords and verify the authentication flow with comprehensive testing.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,384.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-2054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-2054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data